Showing posts with label Kinmen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kinmen. Show all posts

Friday, November 01, 2013

Burmese Pythons: A Kinmen endemic species

When I was on Kinmen in August I didn't see any Burmese Pythons. How depressing.

Taiwan Today ran a piece on the discovery that the Burmese Python of Kinmen, long thought to be invasive, is actually an endemic species of Kinmen Island. The piece on the DNA work that showed that was recently published in Zoological Studies. You et al (2013) note:
The python once occurred on the islands in the early twentieth century, when the natural environment was less damaged (Hu 1976). However, those records were neglected by biologists until 2009, when Shiang et al. (2009) first included this python in their handbook based on a news report from 1950. Until that time, scientists had not formally recognized that this snake lived on these islands.

Rediscovery of pythons on the islands began in 2003, when reported by local newspapers (Kinmen Daily News, 16 June 2003). Since then, farmers and villagers have increasingly reported python sightings. Most of the snakes were captured because of their predation at chicken, duck, or lamb farms (You et al. 2011). By the winter of 2009, so many pythons had been captured that this species was becoming a nuisance to local farmers, who were experiencing financial losses due to predation of livestock by the snakes. Numerous complaints to the county and Taiwanese central governments were filed, and the authorities were encouraged to provide funding for scientific research on the pythons.

One of the most controversial issues is the origin of these pythons, because local residents cannot recall seeing such large snakes in the last half century. As a trade center between Taiwan and China, this region is notorious as a route for the illegal wildlife trade, including large numbers of yellow-margined box turtles (Cuora flavomarginata) and other herpetofauna for the pet trade (Chen and Lue 2010). Considering that pythons have rapidly invaded the state of Florida in the US, local people soon concluded that the presence of pythons was the result of introductions by pet traders. This hypothesis was strongly supported by field workers, including experienced birdwatchers, wildlife photographers, filmmakers, and ecologists (primarily mammalogists, ornithologists, and invertebrate zoologists from several different laboratories) who have spent decades investigating wildlife on the islands but had never seen or heard of a python (S.-M. Lin, personal interviews). 
The research article goes on to show that the DNA of the pythons on Kinmen is more closely related to species that live across the water in China than to pythons in the pet trade, which come from Vietnam. They are also adapted to Kinmen's cooler weather. This suggests that they recolonized Kinmen.

The snake benefited from the military's withdrawal, which enabled it to spread. You et al point out that another beneficiary of the withdrawal of the military is the otter.
Surveys of river otters Lutra lutra on Kinmen and Little Kinmen islands were carried out in 1992 and 1993. In order to record sightings of otters in the past, 12 Kinmen residents who had seen or caught otters before were interviewed. Interview results indicated that the otter is a resident, breeding species on Kinmen. Survey results indicated presence of otters throughout Kinmen and in many sites on Little Kinmen. However, habitat degradation, including pollution and drought, may pose serious threats to the continued existence of the species on both islands.
Kinmen has many areas which contains explosives, mines, and other dangers. These areas are avoided by residents. As a result, they have become thriving areas for wildlife, much as the North/South Korea border region has.
_______________________
Don't miss the comments below! And check out my blog and its sidebars for events, links to previous posts and picture posts, and scores of links to other Taiwan blogs and forums!

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

In Kinmen with FTV

Another trip with Michella and FTV, this time a brief night in Taipei followed by a trip to Kinmen. I really enjoyed Kinmen's completely different atmosphere and its interesting and well-preserved old buildings. Hoping to get back there soon for a few days of cycling around the island. Click on READ MORE for photos and commentary on the visit.

Sunday, July 08, 2012

Matsu Votes for Casinos

A 200mm telephoto is great for portraits. She was shy and wouldn't face the camera.

“Honestly, I don’t believe that the future casino operator would be able to give us the NT$80,000 per month subsidy, I don’t even care if the casino goes out of business in a few years,” she said. “When the casino closes, the bridge and the airport that they built would still be around, right?” -- Woman quoted in Taipei Times

The Taipei Times reports:
According to final figures announced by the Lienchiang County Government, 56 percent voted in favor of the initiative, against 42 percent who opposed it. A total of 3,162 of 7,762 eligible voters cast ballots, for a voter turnout of 40.7 percent. Among those who voted, 1,795 supported the casino plan, while 1,341 were against it. There were 28 invalid ballots.
Turnout of 40%... the legislature had changed the referendum law for gambling for the previous referendum on gambling in the Penghu. The law had previously required that 50% of the electorate had to vote on a referendum to make it valid. After held two votes on referenda for gambling, perhaps it will become more difficult for the KMT gov't to avoid a referendum if it attempts to annex the island to China in some meaningful way. Despite the alleged importance of the vote to the island's economy, 60% of the electorate of this totally pro-KMT island couldn't be bothered to come out and vote, likely because it was inevitable that it would win.

The developer made all sorts of promises: an international airport (which must be built if the casino is going to operate), a college town, a causeway linking the two islands in the area, and buckets of money, $18,000 a month after the first year (basically minimum wage) rising to $80,000 a month in the fifth year if profits reach a certain level.  A legislator pointed out in the Taipei Times piece that things might not be so easy:
“Before a casino resort can be built, the legislature first needs to pass the proposed Gambling Act [博奕法],” he said. “Besides, most of the land in Matsu is either government or military property. Some is even restricted military zones — so there is a long and complicated administrative procedure to go through.”

He also questioned Weidner Resorts Taiwan’s willingness to make such a huge investment to improve or build transportation and tourism facilities in Matsu.

“I’m personally opposed to the casino plan, but I respect the opinion of the majority,” Chen said.
I think the history of developmentalist state projects in Taiwan suggests three things (1) the KMT-controlled legislature will pass the gambling law; (2) the developer is going to renege on most of the promises except the airport; and (3) if the developer wants to build on government land, they will just go ahead and do it and worry about the permits later if ever -- the usual practice for developers in Taiwan. That will not be so easy for military land.... however, I don't think that any great casino development will ever occur on Matsu, because....

Reuters reported:
Analysts say a casino in Matsu would have minimal impact on gambling revenues in Macau which is located on China's southern coast. It is also not clear how easy it would be for Chinese citizens to get visas to travel to the Taiwanese islands.

"Five percent of overall visitation to Macau is from Taiwan, and Matsu is less conveniently located from Taipei than Macau," Macau and Las Vegas-based Union Gaming said in a note.

Weidner Resorts Taiwan, a company run by former Las Vegas Sands executive Bill Weidner, has unveiled plans to build a casino resort that includes luxury hotels, professional sports venues and convention halls.
"Professional sports venues"?? On Matsu?

The putative casinos are obviously aimed at punters from neighboring Fujian province in China, not Taiwanese.....

In my previous post on this topic I collected the following information.....
The AmCham article notes that infrastructure on Matsu is primitive and bad weather often shuts down transportation, making it the less preferable of the two islands. It seems intuitively obvious that a referendum for Kinmen is in the cards at some point.
This suggests also that this whole Matsu casino thing is vapor and no casinos are ever going to appear on the island -- the real point is to have the referendum in a place where it can't lose, get the necessary gambling laws passed, and then put pressure on Kinmen to allow casino gambling.

The AmCham article also makes the comical claim that casinos in Taiwan can be kept free of gangsterism. Kinda like the way professional baseball in Taiwan is, eh? I also observed that those casinos are covered under the offshore islands act, which frees businesses on the island of taxation. Meaning that those casinos will pay no taxes to the government, as far as I can see. Does anyone know different?

UPDATE: Comments are great.

_______________________
Don't miss the comments below! And check out my blog and its sidebars for events, links to previous posts and picture posts, and scores of links to other Taiwan blogs and forums! Delenda est, baby.

Tuesday, June 05, 2012

Islands Gambling, Round 2,

Cutting leaves to wrap betel nut in Dashan, Miaoli.

Since President Ma assumed the Dragon Wyvern Throne in 2008, the KMT has been pushing for casinos on one of the islands under its jurisdiction. Ma himself is often said to personally favor this policy. However, since being surprisingly spanked in a referendum on the gambling in the Penghu in 2009 despite using the usual tactics, the Ma Administration has been quiet on the issue of gambling.

As a commentary in today's Taipei Times by Green Party spokesman Pan Han-shen observes, we are right now in a similar run up to a referendum July 7 on gambling on Matsu, an island off the coast of China. Matsu is a reliably pro-KMT district and residents can be expected to vote for gambling. The KMT made this easier, as the TT noted in 2009 just prior to the Penghu vote, by amending the referendum law specifically for offshore island gambling referendums:
TN goes on to observe that the KMT built an impossibly high barrier to the passage of the referendum with the infamous "double majority" law that requires that the vote consist of a majority with at least 50% of voters having voted. What they did was cheat: in January the KMT rammed through a clause in the offshore gambling statute deleting the requirement that 50% of voters must vote in the referendum for it be valid. An article on it in Gambling Compliance describes:
But the amended law only requires that more than half of the voter turnout vote yea for the referendum to pass - a much lower threshold than that stipulated in Taiwan's Referendum Act. That law requires that at least half of all eligible voters participate in a plebiscite, with more than half of that turnout voting yea for it to pass.
As someone commented in the Taipei Times piece, the KMT's streamlining of the referendum law means that if 3 people vote and 2 favor it, it will pass. This time the KMT has moved the gambling initiative to the even more reliably pro-KMT island of Matsu to ensure passage. Why Matsu? AmCham hosted a one-sided article on the gambling issue last year that explains. Of the two islands off of China, Kinmen and Matsu, the latter was seen as more welcoming...
Enactment of the law would set the stage for another round of local referendums in the two jurisdictions considered to be main candidates for casino development: Kinmen and Matsu. Approval of the referendum in Matsu is thought to be a shoo-in, as the island group, home to only a few thousand residents, is “desperate” for casino gambling, says Anita Chen of Park Strategies. Matsu reportedly wanted to hold its referendum as soon as possible to get a foot in the door, but was widely seen as responding to KMT pressure to hold off until after the presidential election in January.
Park Strategies is a US lobbying firm close to the Ma Administration. The AmCham article notes that infrastructure on Matsu is primitive and bad weather often shuts down transportation, making it the less preferable of the two islands. It seems intuitively obvious that a referendum for Kinmen is in the cards at some point.

The AmCham article makes the claim that casinos can be kept free of money-laundering and gangsters. No doubt this is because it's so common for vice-related businesses in Taiwan to be free of such activities that I am sure they will have no trouble. In related news, this weekend I am leading a hunting expedition looking for flying pigs.

Pan writes that....
In 2009, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) promoted a referendum on gambling in Penghu on the condition that gambling would not be legalized on Taiwan proper under Ma’s watch. [Taichung mayor] Hu, however, thinks that “we should not look upon ‘gaming’ as some kind of ‘compensation’ and only allow the establishment of special zones in more slowly developing areas,” and is thus promoting the establishment of a special gambling district in Greater Taichung. The intent behind the text which would allow gambling in the Offshore Islands Development Act (離島建設條例) is finally revealed.
There are no real islands off of Taichung, but no doubt one could easily be made out of reclaimed land, or simply magicked into existence by creative definition ("for the purposes of the law, an island is defined as an area bounded by land on four sides but selected by Mayor Hu"). The Offshore Islands Development Act "encourages" development on islands by relieving businesses there of the burden of tax....
2. Goods sold, delivered and used locally on offshore islands, or services provided locally on offshore islands by business entities to which the Act applies, are exempt from business tax starting from the date the Act is implemented, except for business entities in Lyudao, Lanyu, Liouciou, which are exempt from business tax as of 25th January, 2009.
That means that -- you guessed it -- all those casino businesses will have taxpayer-funded roads, water, police, fire, and other services -- without paying any tax themselves. They will return nothing to the society, while putting tremendous strain on local resources. The Matsu page of the National Tax Administration confirms that businesses there pay no taxes. Pan adds that DPP Mayor Chen Chu of Kaohsiung supports gambling; Kaohsiung hosts right offshore the already popular tourist destination of Cijin Island, famed for its seafood. One wonders if it will fall under the Offshore Islands Act.

The casino drive is using the same kind of ZOMG we're missing out! shock-doctrine tactics common to KMT-approved construction-industrial state projects and China-related policies:
Anita Chen of Park Strategies says that casino-resorts could represent the next big wave of infrastructure development in Taiwan – but only if Taiwan acts quickly. She notes that Japan, Vietnam, and the Philippines are considering their own plans for casino development, so that long delays might cause investors to look elsewhere. “We’re not only competing for Chinese customers,” she notes. “We’re competing for investors.”
Fortunately, casino proponents are handicapped by a lack of coordination. So stay tuned -- what might fly in Matsu might sink in Kinmen. I think at that point the Administration will start looking for a site on the main island of Taiwan.

If we are going to have useless, parasitical casinos -- and I see no reason that sooner or later we won't, given who backs the Ma Administration and why -- then they really ought to be heavily taxed and a clause inserted in the law to make sure that they source their machines and personnel locally. Taiwan has a large, and largely unknown, gaming machine industry, which could certainly use a boost onto the world stage. But we both know, dear reader, that pigs will fly.....
_____________
Daily Links:
_______________________
Don't miss the comments below! And check out my blog and its sidebars for events, links to previous posts and picture posts, and scores of links to other Taiwan blogs and forums! Delenda est, baby.

Sunday, March 15, 2009

Sunday Odds and Ends

One of the more frustrating phenomena for those who want to create any kind of positive change in Taiwan is the public's habit of re-electing our legislature despite its constant complaints about how bad the government is. Its approval ratings are consistently low -- 28% in Feb according to this TVBS poll (recall that TVBS is blatantly pro-KMT). (Interestingly, support for Chen Shui-bian is at 23% in this TVBS poll, while Ma is as low as 28% approval in some polls). The public seems to feel that so long as the legislator comes to help them out with traffic accidents and shows up for their weddings and funerals, then their legislator's performance in office is of no consequence.

In Miaoli "independent" candidate Kang Shih-ju beat the wife of convicted vote-buyer Lee E-tin in the local by-election, The Taipei Times writes:
Kang, chief of Zhunan Township (竹南), gave up his KMT membership to run in the by-election. He declared victory yesterday after winning 41,688 votes to Chen’s 40,099 votes.

Lee’s election to the legislature was annulled in December after he was found guilty of vote-buying.

After yesterday’s results were in, Kang said at his campaign headquarters that the public had voted for an end to corruption. He vowed to combat corruption and work for the interests of Miaoli residents.

“The result of the by-election show that voters in Miaoli County renounce corruption and support me for my integrity and long-term efforts to develop Miaoli County,” Kang said.

Chen, accompanied by Lee, conceded defeat shortly afterward at her campaign headquarters. Chen and Lee blamed her defeat on the low turnout rate. They said they would not seek a recount.

Kang failed to win the KMT’s nomination for the legislative election last year and left the party after it again passed him over for the by-election, choosing Chen instead.
Lee had been convicted of vote buying using temples back in December...
The court verdict said Lee made 16 visits to temples in Yuanli and Jhunan — two of the eight townships in one of Miaoli County’s two electoral districts — between June and October last year.

During that time he made donations and solicited support via his campaign aides for his election bid. Because Lee had not been previously known to make donations to temples and had only done so during the election campaign, the court ruled they were designed to improperly influence voter behavior.
I didn't hear that any of the temples were busted for participating in the vote buying scheme. Shouldn't some temple association leaders be behind bars? Kang is a good example of the way former KMTers simply turn "independent" if not permitted to run by the party electoral processes, something the KMT relaxed its exclusion clause for criminal behavior to prevent.

Observe that despite the corruption, and the attempt to game the system by Lee running his wife for the office, a common practice of corrupt local politicians (example), they only lost the election by a whisker. As I wrote three years ago:
Yet, in fair elections, the public consistently returns corrupt politicians to office. Stop me before I kill again! seems to be the message voters are sending.
The good news about Kang's victory is that he has promised to caucus with the DPP, and received DPP support in the election.

Some interesting, and in its way, portentous, news from the US where Taiwan Caucus Co-Chair and ardent Taiwan supporter Dana Rohrabacher, the California Republican, has decided to step down from that position.
Rohrabacher said in the interview that his resignation was primarily the result of a growing gap in goals between him and Taiwan’s government.

Rohrabacher said that he firmly believed in opposing autocracy, but if Taiwanese voters via a democratic election have chosen to cooperate with China, then his participation was inconsequential.
The Liberty Times report is here.

Echo Taiwan points to an interesting report from the Chunghua Institute of Economic Research (CIER), not a notably pan-Green organization, that says of the proposal to build a bridge between China and Kinmen:
Earlier this month, CIER announces the evaluation report. It says that there might be economic benefits, but due to the fact that Xiamen is a much more developed area than Kinmen is, a bridge will speed up the outflow of Kinmen resources and eventually bring deterioration to Kinmen in the long run.

Therefore the evaluation report suggests that Ma government to postpone such a plan (中經院報告 建議金廈大橋緩建, Liberty Times, Mar 3rd, 2009)

According the the above news piece, the evaluation is entirely based on the economy interests. Neither the safety of Kinmen against possible invasion nor the national security of Taiwan is evaluated.
What? The same logic applies to Taiwan -- closer links with China simply mean that more resources will flow outward from Taiwan to China. As we have seen.....

_______________________
Don't miss the comments below! And check out my blog and its sidebars for events, links to previous posts and picture posts, and scores of links to other Taiwan blogs and forums!

Sunday, July 15, 2007

China Post Stealth Attack on Taiwan Independence

You don't expect parody from the leaden pages of the China Post, but the other day they ran a very funny article on "the Kinmen identity" which is an ROC identity. The article describes a study published in an academic journal, based on 10 interviews:

This explains why several interviewees avowed a national identity with the ROC rather than a regional identity with Taiwan. As one interviewee pointed out: "I don't identify with the word 'Taiwan.' The 'Republic of China' has more meaning for us, because I think Taiwan is included in the ROC."

In the 1980s, the PRC's military confrontation was replaced with detente, Taiwan began to withdraw troops, and Taiwan's independence and "de-Sinicization" movement grew in strength. With these changes, Kinmen's people grew concerned about being marginalized, and that "Taiwan didn't identify with Kinmen."

Said one Kinmen interviewee, "We had been ruled under martial law. We made sacrifices because of the war. Our government doesn't pay attention to us."

Another responded, "Some people say that Xiamen is a marginalized city, Taiwan is a marginalized place in the world, and Kinmen is a marginalized part of Taiwan."

When the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) came to power in 2000, many Kinmenese opposed Taiwan's independence for fear that Kinmen would someday be cut off from it.


The islanders are pro-KMT and vote for the Blue side almost to a man. The clever bias of the article -- calling "Taiwan" a regional identity, and denigrating it by subtle comparison to a local identity in Kinmen -- is brilliant. Oddly, this article has a byline, which is unusual in an article that uses propaganda terms like "de-sinicization." Most of the time those read "China Post Staff" which means they are translations from the Chinese-langage articles in the China Times. Read the whole thing to get the flavor.