Thursday, June 16, 2011

Simplified Characters removed from gov't websites

Mayor Ma of Taipei in 2002 ordered that Hanyu Pinyin, the official PRC romanization system, be used on all signs because it facilitated Taiwan's globalization. President Ma in 2011 drew the line at simplified characters.....
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) yesterday told the Tourism Bureau to remove the simplified Chinese version from its Web site, saying all government agencies should use traditional Chinese characters in official documents and on the Internet.

The president’s instructions came in the wake of a dispute over the use of simplified characters to cater to an expected influx of Chinese free independent travelers (FITs).
The Tourism Bureau had provided simplified Chinese among other languages on its Web site. The simplified Chinese version was removed yesterday morning.

“To maintain our role as the pioneer in Chinese culture, all government bodies should use traditional Chinese in official documents and on their Web sites, so that people around the world can learn about the beauty of traditional characters,” Presidential Office spokesman Fan Chiang Tai-chi (范姜泰基) quoted Ma as saying.
An interesting call by Ma, who has worked hard to shape the discourse on China from his bully pulpit as President (remember when he demanded that everyone in the gov't refer to China as "the mainland?"). The Tourism Bureau already uses simplified characters in their promotional materials in China, and called on shops and restaurants frequented by Chinese tourists to add menus and other information in simplified characters.
_________________
Daily Links:
_______________________ 
Don't miss the comments below! And check out my blog and its sidebars for events, links to previous posts and picture posts, and scores of links to other Taiwan blogs and forums! Delenda est, baby.

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

HSR subsiding?

Areas of land subsidence in Taiwan; all except Taipei are fish farming centers (source). 

The new head of the public construction commission is all over the subsidence problem in central Taiwan, saying that it will cause the HSR to slow to a crawl within a decade if something is not done (AFP report). The Taipei Times gives more detail:
The earth is sinking under the nation’s high-speed rail line, New Public Construction Commission (PCC) Minister Lee Hong-yuan (李鴻源) said yesterday, warning that it could become inoperable in 10 years if nothing is done.

The soil has subsided because of excessive draining of ground water on a stretch of the line in Yunlin County and the limit of what is considered safe is fast approaching, Lee said.
“The high-speed rail can safely operate for a maximum of 10 years if the problem is kept under control,” Lee said.

“However, the area affected has expanded this year because of the water shortage problem. With more ground water being lost, 10 years has become a conservative estimate,” added Lee, who on Monday traveled to Yunlin with other government officials to inspect the high-speed rail line.
The Minister pointed out that the problem is serious not only in Yunlin but also in Changhua and Chiayi, threatening a total of 1,400 km2 in the three counties (this paper says "The total cumulative subsided land area in Taiwan has reached 1,941 km2 (Chang 2004), or about 20.5% of the total plains area of 9489.90 km2 (EPA 2007)"). I wrote an extensive piece on subsidence in Yunlin a while back, which gives some (scary!) numbers but also notes that the issue is compounded by the fact that laws are promulgated by the central gov't but enforcement is up to the local government, which often turns a blind eye to the problem. The paper cited above also notes:
Even if the area of continuous coastal subsidence is reduced, the cumulative subsided depth will still increase. In areas where fish farms are concentrated, such as Jiadung District of Pingtung County, in the beginning of the LSPTIP in 1995, the subsidence depth was 2.82 m but had increased to 3.24 m by 2006; the maximum cumulative subsidence depth on the coast of Changhua County in 2001 was 2.02 m, and that in Yunlin County was 2.10 m. However, by 2008, cumulative subsidence in these two areas had increased to 2.52 and 2.4 m, respectively (Water Resources Management and Policy Research Center 2009).
The original layout of the HSR line didn't help either; with unerring accuracy it was planned for lowlands with some of the worst subsidence on the island. Yet even as early as the late 1980s/early 1990s the subsidence problem in these areas was already known (for example) and could have been avoided by re-routing the line. Argh.
_____________
Daily Links:
_______________________
Don't miss the comments below! And check out my blog and its sidebars for events, links to previous posts and picture posts, and scores of links to other Taiwan blogs and forums! Delenda est, baby.

Euro Parliament Taiwan Friendship Group Head slams WHO

Big round of applause today for the EU and Charles Tannock:
Dr Tannock, who is the chairman of the European Parliament-Taiwan Friendship Group, told Dr Chan in the letter that as a citizen of the People’s Republic of China she was calling into question her own integrity by instructing staff to take such an overtly political position in referring to Taiwan.

......

The letter read:

“No United Nations specialised agency has the right unilaterally to decide on the status in international law of any given country or territory.

“As you well know, UN agencies and their staff are required to remain impartial and not to take instructions from or show favour to any national government.

“We wish to remind you that neither UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 nor World Health Assembly Resolution 25.1 make any reference to Taiwan's status in international law or its status vis-à-vis the People's Republic of China.

“The WHO's explicit reference to Taiwan as a province of China has no basis in international law.

“It is therefore hard to avoid the conclusion that the People's Republic of China has deliberately sought to compromise the independence and impartiality of the WHO for its own political purposes.

“As Director-General of WHO, you are responsible for the internal policy of referring to Taiwan as a province of China.

“You are also a citizen of, and were nominated for your post by, the People's Republic of China.

“WHO's continued insistence on referring to Taiwan as a province of China therefore not only undermines the organisation's credibility but risks calling into question your personal impartiality and integrity.

“We believe the WHO's position on Taiwan is politically and morally flawed.

“We urge you to change WHO's internal procedures to refer to Taiwan as 'Chinese Taipei', the accepted nomenclature that Taiwan uses in other international organisations and structures.

“Finally, we believe that Taiwan, with its excellent healthcare sector and world-class doctors, has much to contribute to the WHO.

“Mindful of the Council of the European Union's declaration of support in September 2008 for Taiwan's meaningful participation in international organisations, we urge you to ensure that Taiwan is enabled to play such a role within the WHO.

“Healthcare is a basic human right and should never be exploited as a political pawn.”
Slam! Slam! SLAM! Nice. Tannock connects the attack on Taiwan's status to the fact that the WHO director is from China. Of course! Also hacks on Chan's integrity. Orz Orz Orz.

Jim Webb, the Dem Senator from Virginia, also took time this week to slam Beijing for the growing tensions in the South China Sea, saying:
“I think we in our government have taken too weak of a position on this,” Webb, a member of US President Barack Obama’s Democratic Party from Virginia, said at the Council on Foreign Relations.

“When we say the United States government doesn’t have a position on sovereignty issues, not taking a position is taking a position,” Webb said.

The bill introduced by Webb and Senator James Inhofe, the subcommittee’s top Republican, “condemns the use of force” by China and affirms that the US military will “assert and defend freedom of navigation rights” in the South China Sea.
It would probably be much easier for the Obama Administration to take a stronger and more supportive position if the 2009 Nobel Peace prize winner were not engaged in at least four wars at the same time (Greenwald rips yet another illegal and unconstitutional war). Sooner or later I expect calls from smarter analysts to terminate our stupidity in the Middle East and focus on Asia, where the future is.

China meanwhile whined that "outsiders" should stay out of the South China Sea disputes. This is the same pattern we see with Taiwan -- China attempting to prevent internationalization and multilateralization of the issue. If the Spratlys were inhabited by 23 million people, Beijing would attempt to curb their international space and play games with their visas -- exactly the tactic it is taking in Arunachal Pradesh....
_______________________
Don't miss the comments below! And check out my blog and its sidebars for events, links to previous posts and picture posts, and scores of links to other Taiwan blogs and forums! Delenda est, baby.

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

As the Elections Loom 1

The legislative elections are coming up in seven months or so (yes, that fast). Focus Taiwan offered a piece on the opinions of Frederic Chien, a longtime KMTer who has held a number of important posts. Chien thought the KMT has a real possibility of losing the Presidential election....
In short, Chien said, Taiwan is a society in which a kind-hearted man will hurt himself simply because of his kind-heartedness.

"And the president is a prime example of this, " Chien added.

Chien disagreed with the interviewer's projection that Ma would win the presidential election in January 2012 but that it would be a "hard-won victory."

Chien cited unbiased polls that showed former Premier Su Tseng-chang or Democratic Progressive Party Chairwoman Tsai Ing-wen could beat Ma by between 4 percent and 6 percent of the vote in the next presidential election.

"There should be no more doubts about the opinion polls, " Chien said.

Another worry that Chien openly expressed during the TV interview was the low turnout of pan-blue voters in the various elections held since 2008.
The low turnout problem for the KMT might be boosted by the fact that the legislative and presidential elections are being held on the same day, meaning that voters who might not have turned out for a Presidential election will be out to vote for the local legislative rep, and thus might cast a vote for Ma while they are at it.

To me more interesting is how the paired election will affect DPP voters. Too many of them split their vote, voting DPP for the Presidency but KMT because their local legislator sent a bottle of wine for their son's wedding or once showed up to fix a car accident for them. One wonders if it will help the DPP by not only getting more voters out but getting them to think about about how they vote too.

Chien seems to be speaking sincerely and not out of a desire merely to motivate pan-Blue votes. To buttress his point about the polls, in the prediction market at NCCU, Tsai is still leading Ma 50.9 to 48.4 (note that this number expresses who is expected to win, not by how much the win will be). A recent DPP poll has Tsai up by about a point. According to the DPP pollster, Tsai crushes Ma among neutral voters, 55-35. But we have months of screw-ups by both parties still ahead of us.

Stories about the James Soong and his party, the People First Party (PFP) were also running around this week. The Taipei Times reported that the PFP appears determined to play a spoiler role to augment its power in the Legislative Yuan.
In view of People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong’s (宋楚瑜) recent declaration that his party would nominate a handful of candidates for January’s legislative elections, cooperation between the PFP and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) for the elections has fallen under a dark cloud as room for negotiation grows narrower, KMT officials said.

A KMT official who wished to remain unnamed said the current tension between the two parties suggested that a meeting between Soong and President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who doubles as KMT chairman, is very unlikely, adding that if things stay as they are, the outlook for PFP-KMT cooperation is unlikely.

According to KMT Culture and Communications Committee director Su Jun-pin (蘇俊賓), the KMT extended a message to Soong for a meeting between him and Ma, but the PFP has not responded.
One important aspect of the KMT's success in 2008 was its ability to corral votes that had previously gone to the PFP and return them to the KMT. The PFP melted away with many of its legislators returning to the KMT. Soong is probably angling for some concession from the KMT not to cause problems; it was also rumored this week that he would run for President. However, Soong had little effect on the Taipei mayor election when he ran in 2006 and I don't see how he will have that big an impact on the 2012 Presidential election, which he surely will realize. He will be 70 next year.
_______________
Daily Links:


_______________________ 
Don't miss the comments below! And check out my blog and its sidebars for events, links to previous posts and picture posts, and scores of links to other Taiwan blogs and forums! Delenda est, baby.

BANG Events, a new resource for young people.

This week I had the privilege of meeting and interviewing local expat and Taipei resident Prashantha Lachanna, or Prish, as she is known to her friends. Prish started a company in 2009 called BANG Events that has produced a life skills play aimed at junior high school students across Taiwan. It focuses on issues that junior high students face, especially the core issues of cyber-bullying, difficult family situations, academic cheating, and integrity in friendships and relationships.

Because this blogger so often sees and hears about the effects of bullying and other negative schooling experiences in his own students, I thought Prish and her play might be a useful resource for the many of my readers who work in junior highs and high schools throughout Taiwan.

Before developing the script, Prish spent six months doing research. She spoke to child protection officers, psychologists, teachers, students, parents, and friends. She also explored academic research on educational tracking and psychological well-being of Taiwanese youth from elementary through to senior high. The research showed obvious peaks of depression in transitional phases with a number of contributing factors involved, such as familial pressure or a lack of familial guidance, teacher-student relationships, social networks bred between students and the competitive educational system of Taiwan.

Prish told me that “when I started this project I was really disturbed by stories my students told me about situations they or friends of theirs faced in their daily lives. They talked about other students who, in the middle of class, cut themselves, students who repeatedly banged their heads against the wall, students dealing with anorexia.” She said that the most important issue that came up was social aggression, or bullying, as we ordinary mortals call it. Whereas bullying used to be confined to playgrounds, at present day, students have access to all kinds of electronic devices that allow them to take bullying into cyber space – place that offers little protection or empathy and that places its victims under 24 hour torture. Suicides in the US have been reported. The White House issued a speech and so has President Ma after the recent violent incident of bullying in Hsinchu.

Another core issue in the play, integrity in friendships and relations, or dating safety has to be explored as she feels that young girls are often coerced into dangerous situations by sexual predators. In the play, the main character, Xiao Zhu meets Tsai Ge, a much older man who is obvious bad news, at a local MTV in Ximen. Her best friends XZ and Mike do what they can to protect her but in the end, it is up to XZ to make the right choice. Prish says: “All junior high students must see this and talk about this because there are so many issues involved in making a decision to do something this dangerous, from poor self esteem to a lack of understanding about setting boundaries to a need to be accepted. Young girls who face these situations are then criticized and judged. This just adds to the chaos. Young girls need to be heard, educated and respected. If you hand education to a child, you immediately empower him/her.”

The show consists of two parts, a 30 minute life skills play and a 30 minute facilitation session immediately afterwards (it thus fits neatly into the one hour period schedules all local schools have). The life skills play can cater to either international or local students, she said. It is currently performed in English, with a little bit of Chinese in it, but a Chinese version has been developed and is currently being learned by her team.

The show is an “empowering intervention”. It is filled with archetypal images and situations. “It has to be familiar,” Prish explained, “it has to have happened in their lives, to make the connection so the messages can be gently slipped in.” She added “we don’t resolve all conflicts presented in the show, on purpose, because we want to inspire dialogue in the 30 minute facilitation session after the show.” Thus the show creates a space to look at a conflict that wasn’t resolved so that audience participants can ask why. We then ask them what they would do, and whether it would be the only thing that they could do, and how else a given conflict could potentially be resolved. According to Prish, the purpose of this process is to develop the idea of the students being active participants in their own lives, to develop an identity of self, and to develop a sense of empathy. The actors, who are both local and expat, are all trained facilitators.

“What can we hope to achieve in an hour? We hope to shift a thought that can change a single action, at least. And that one action could be something that could benefit everyone,” she says. The show isn’t only designed to solve problems but rather, to create dialogue. Of course, the facilitators will answer fact-based questions in a straightforward manner so that misconceptions can be minimized.

After the show each guidance teacher at each school gets three follow up lesson plans from BANG, based on the core issues of the play, in Chinese. Every parent gets a USB stick that has a resource package in Chinese with advice on how to open communication with their child in a positive and compassionate way, and links to organizations that provide family help in Taipei city with contact details. A parent-child contract is also included. It comes from a cyberbullying organization in the USA, www.cyberbullying.org. This is signed and hung above the family computer. The contract plays the role of buffer between parents and child. With both sides being held accountable for safe internet usage, it makes people more actively aware of their roles. Students get their own resource, kind of “What to do if…?” guide.

To support the show, Prish says that her company has created a system of support through collaborations with other organizations. “We’ve formed relationships with networks of organizations that work with kids and families. If at the end of the facilitation, a child needs help, by discreetly mentioning something to our facilitators, we know how to get help immediately. We are working with child and adolescent protection offices across the city, including Grace Counseling, the organization that works with marriage, divorce and psychological issues such as bulimia, anorexia and learning disorders, and The Community Services center in Tianmu. The Community Services Center had one of their best psychologists, Perry Malcolm, review the show, and he gave it a powerful endorsement, Prish said.

BANG is also working with two very exciting people. One of them is the UN young ambassador, Darren Yeh. Darren travels around Taiwan speaking to students in tertiary institutions and in the workforce about developing leadership skills in their lives. As a supplementary aid to the show, Darren will also be available to give a one hour speech in Chinese about developing leadership skills. Darren is sponsored by BANG and is free of charge to the school. Darren is affiliated with Dharma Drum, the well-known Buddhist organization. As BANG develops its relationship with Darren, more courses will be offered for students, including an exclusive weekend leadership retreat for Grade 12 students.

The other exciting person is the “gentleman of hip-hop”, the performance artist, Leo Shia, or LEO37 as he is known on stage. Leo earned a degree from Toronto’s Ryerson University's prestigious Radio and Television Arts Program while also finding himself on stage and in studio with some of the city's most acclaimed jazz, folk, pop and hip-hop artists. LEO37 will partner with BANG to carry out hip/ hop, rap and beat box workshops with the students during the summer and winter. Local students love hip-hop, and music as intervention is a powerful device which empowers young people.

The cost to the show is calculated per student. BANG can comfortably perform for audiences of 20 – 200. To date they have performed 4 shows.

BANG is planning now for the September tour but are still available to visit schools this semester. The tour runs through the school year, Sept 2011 to June 2012. Although self-funded, Prish is currently looking for sources of funding that will help her bring the show to students across Taiwan, especially in rural areas. Contact prish: prish@bang-events.com or visit www.bang-events.com for more information. You can also follow BANG on www.facebook.com/bangevents
_______________________
Don't miss the comments below! And check out my blog and its sidebars for events, links to previous posts and picture posts, and scores of links to other Taiwan blogs and forums! Delenda est, baby.

Daily Links, June 14, 2011

Hsinchu115
It's all out there in black and white....

SPECIAL: China stages huge naval drill. Vietnam is holding drills in the South China Sea. Very scary.

BLOG

MEDIA

_______________________

Don't miss the comments below! And check out my blog and its sidebars for events, links to previous posts and picture posts, and scores of links to other Taiwan blogs and forums! Delenda est, baby.

Monday, June 13, 2011

Awesome Nantou 63

I did some really great riding this weekend. Saturday I went up to Guguan, always an enjoyable ride. Sunday I drove down to Shuili with Drew of Taiwan in Cycles and another friend, Andrew, and rode a little loop out of Shuili -- up 131 and over to 21, around the corner of Sun Moon Lake to Ita Thao (Dehua Village), then south out of Dehua Village on Nantou 63 back to 16 and Shuili (map).

The picture above I took from a scenic spot on Nantou 63. It utterly fails to do justice to one of the most beautiful moments of my life: after lunch in Dehua Village, we followed the switchbacks up Nantou 63 to 800 meters, surmounted the ridge above Sun Moon Lake as it began to rain, and then beheld the utter glory of Taiwan at its most beautiful, the interplay of gentle light and rainy cloud in the deep mountains framing a classic alpine descent of switchbacks through farm, forest, and field down to Route 16 and the Choshui River. Pure biking heaven.

Just knew the day would be good; the mountains were as clear as I have ever seen them as we drove down Highway 3 to Shuili.

In Shuili a peanut seller was out harvesting sales in the early morning.

Andrew readies for the ride.

131 sweeps north out of Shuili past the reservoir. The grade is not difficult and the views across the betel nut covered slopes of Nantou are splendid.

After farms comes a national forest.

Tunnel on 131 in the land of betel nut trees.

The rain and cool skies meant lots of critters out and about.

On 131 nearing 21 just below Sun Moon Lake. In this area the B&Bs and other tourist stuff begins.

Taking a break at Sun Moon Lake after climbing 21.

Dehua was overrun with tourists, as always.

After lunch and coffee in Dehua, we turned south onto Nantou 63 and began climbing the switchbacks out of the basin of Sun Moon Lake. There are excellent views over the lake on this side. Soon it began to drizzle.

Not everybody was hiding from the rain.

Coming over the other side, we found ourselves among the great peaks of central Taiwan.

I didn't take many pics on this downhill, roughly 7 kms of switchbacks through the mountains, farms, and fields of central Taiwan. Just rolled slowly down, soaking it up. If it had just been the terrain, you might say "Whoa, awesome." Or if it had been the switchbacks, you might say, "Whoa, awesome." But together, the effect was amazing, especially on that day with the clouds and the light and the rain. Put Nantou 63 on your list, it is in a class by itself.

At last we reached the bottom, and 16.

Andrew rests at the bottom among the peaks lining the river.

Drew waits out a cloudburst at a betel nut stand.

Back to Shuili along 16.

Looking back toward the imposing ranges of central Taiwan. What a wonderful ride. Hope your Sunday was as enjoyable as mine!

ADDED: Drew's excellent account.
_______________________
Don't miss the comments below! And check out my blog and its sidebars for events, links to previous posts and picture posts, and scores of links to other Taiwan blogs and forums! Delenda est, baby.

Sunday, June 12, 2011

Fun with the media

If today's AFP story is any guide, AFP is going to be an endless font of media fun during this election season. The story consists of 12 basically one or two sentence paragraphs. In a story about Ma, a third of it is devoted to explaining that former President Chen Shui-bian is corrupt, while claiming (absurdly) that Ma came to power on an anti-corruption platform. Nowhere does AFP give any nuance to the Chen story (found innocent of embezzlement, for example). Nowhere does AFP mention the massive and pervasive corruption within Ma's own party, particularly ironic given the news this week that the French firm Thales has to pay back millions to Taiwan that were part of the alleged kickback scheme dating from the Lafayette sale during the KMT days.

Indeed, nowhere, in a story on Ma's re-election campaign, does AFP mention the apparently tight race between the two parties' respective candidates, or any other fact about the current election cycle, even one as basic as who Ma is running against (instead, it discusses a former president who is a non-candidate) -- or the DPP's Tsai being in Europe learning about renewables, or a possible spoiler role for James Soong (backstory -- Soong has threatened that he might enter the race, I've heard on the quiet). Lots of fun stuff happening, none of it will show up in the AFP story.

Actually, it is not going to be fun to read AFP this election year. It is going to be sad, at all the potential for communication and understanding lost because AFP's political reporting is so often cartoonish.
____________________
Daily Links
  • Gerrit van der Wees reviews Milo Thornberry's book about his involvement with the pro-democracy movement in the 1960s. My right sidebar has a link so you can purchase this great book.
  • WaPo with a travel piece on Fo Guang Shan and its pro-China, pro-KMT, anti-Taiwan leader, Hsing Yun. No mention of the latter, of course, all is sweetness and light for a "humanistic" Buddhist leader who was a member of the leadership of a brutal authoritarian political party that murdered thousands of people in Taiwan. It's a travel piece, can't expect too much. In researching this I noticed Hsing Yun's Wiki page has been scrubbed. It mentions his political involvement but no longer notes that he is a former KMT central standing committee member; as I recall it used to. I collected some stuff on Hsing Yun back in 2009, including his call for obliterating the local Taiwanese identity.
  • Ma's plan to set up Taiwan culture center in Canada may prove awkward for Canadian gov't.
  • BBC with a story on the grouper trade with China
_______________________
Don't miss the comments below! And check out my blog and its sidebars for events, links to previous posts and picture posts, and scores of links to other Taiwan blogs and forums! Delenda est, baby.

Taiwan DEPH scandal harms Taiwan's Rep

The DEHP scandal has damaged Taiwan's international reputation. Hong Kong stopped sales of certain Taiwan products:
The Centre for Food Safety (CFS) of the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department (FEHD) announced today (June 10) that two samples of Taiwan-style drinks taken at two local drinks shops were found to contain a plasticiser di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP).

The Centre instructed the two shops to immediately stop sale of those drinks. It is tracing the suppliers of the ingredients of the drinks and will collect samples for testing.

The Centre will also instruct the suppliers to suspend the supply of the affected products.

A spokesman for the CFS said, "One sample of 'green apple green tea' taken at a Taiwan-style drinks shop, 'Fan Chum Mei' (translation), by the CFS earlier was found to contain DEHP at a level of 6.8 ppm.

"The other 'icy mango drink' sample collected at 'Ice King' was detected with DEHP at a level of 24 ppm."

The "icy mango drink" sample was taken when the CFS was following up on a notification from the Taiwanese authority earlier that consignments of some fruit juice suspected to be plasticiser-tainted had been distributed to Hong Kong. It was collected from the shop concerned upon enquiries with the local importer about product distribution records.
First, note that it was "Taiwan authorities" notifying Hong Kong that there was a problem. Good PR move.... but probably too late.

In addition to Hong Kong, Malaysia and Philippines have attacked Taiwan food products. In Borneo (Malaysia) one of the local governments has asked the public to stop buying Taiwan food products "for the time being."

DEHP is used in these products as a replacement for more expensive palm oil. Palm oil is a key crop of Borneo, while Philippines is attempting to develop a palm oil industry.

A friend of mine pointed out that if the DEHP is the result of collusion between firms in the PRC and Taiwan, surely many PRC drink products must also be contaminated. Wonder when we will hear that news..... ironically, the PRC has also banned a long list of Taiwan food products.

ADDED: OzSoapbox notes:

I've been following this nonsense for a while now.


http://ozsoapbox.com/taiwan/food/the-great-2011-dehp-plasticizer-food-scare-of-taiwan/


In just the last few days;


One drug company has been found to be supplying Taiwan with a plastic tainted drug whilst providing Singapore with a plasticizer free recipe.


The head of Uni-President pleaded with the public to not blame the innocent companies manufacturing poisoned drinks, but rather the suppliers.


Taiwan's government declaring a product safe one day and recalling it the next.


And I'm sure there's many more stories still to come...

_______________________
Don't miss the comments below! And check out my blog and its sidebars for events, links to previous posts and picture posts, and scores of links to other Taiwan blogs and forums! Delenda est, baby.

Saturday, June 11, 2011

Gourd Shop

Today my friend Domenic and I rode to the checkpoint above Guguan on Highway 8, where the guards turned us back as the road is still under construction. But on the way there, on 8 roughly 400 meters past the last 7-11 outside of Dongshih, we passed this cool shop that sells painted and carved gourds.

The shop not only sells gourds, it also fixes motorcycles.

Gourds ready for further processing. Or sale, as the case may be.

The owner told me the green one was $500 NT.

There are lamps in the back there.

The owner grows his own gourds, in fantastic shapes and sizes.

Gourds on display.
_______________________
Don't miss the comments below! And check out my blog and its sidebars for events, links to previous posts and picture posts, and scores of links to other Taiwan blogs and forums! Delenda est, baby.

Friday, June 10, 2011

China Military On The Move

The language of policy-making discourse:
Outgoing CIA director Leon Panetta, US President Barack Obama’s pick for US secretary of defense, said China was preparing for “potential contingencies” involving Taiwan, which could include potential military clashes.
China is not preparing for "potential contingencies." China is preparing to attack Taiwan, to maim and murder its people, and to annex its territory. The policymaker's distancing euphemisms soften the real world and make the killing that much easier.

Defense News reports that China says it will conduct military exercises in the western Pacific.
Chinese state media reported June 9 that China would conduct naval training drills in the western Pacific later this month, amid lingering fears among Beijing's neighbors about its military ambitions.

The exercises will take place in international waters and are "not targeted at any specific country," the defense ministry said in a statement carried by Xinhua news agency.
A longtime academic observer of Taiwan affairs, reading the news that China's new carrier, said to be named the Shi Lang after the general who took Taiwan for the Manchus, remarked that the US should respond to the upcoming launch of the vessel with the sale of F-16s to Taiwan. Aviation Weekly reports that China is now the major consideration in Indian Air Force deployments.

Turning south, the South China Sea was once again the site of further Chinese tension-mongering.
China warned Asian neighbors Thursday to stop searching for oil near the disputed Spratly Islands and vowed to assert its sovereignty over the potentially petroleum-rich territory in the South China Sea despite rival claims.

China and the Philippines have swapped diplomatic protests over the islands, with Filipino officials accusing Chinese forces of intruding into Manila-claimed areas six times since February and of firing shots in at least one incident. Beijing denied the allegation Thursday and said it would use violence only when attacked.

Vietnam, meanwhile, has accused China of flaring tensions in the sea by hindering the operation of a oil and gas exploration boat for the second time in two weeks.

The Spratlys, which are believed to be atop vast oil and gas reserves, have long been feared as a potential flash point of armed conflict in Asia.
Sitting in Taiwan and watching Beijing stoking tensions throughout Asia, it is incredible to me the way in which the media treats Beijing as a passive agent when it comes to Taiwan. It's the same expansionist drive that is putting troops in the Himal across from India, giving dissidents prison sentences in Tibet, seizing fishing boats in the South China Sea, and pointing missiles at Taiwan.
_______________________
Don't miss the comments below! And check out my blog and its sidebars for events, links to previous posts and picture posts, and scores of links to other Taiwan blogs and forums! Delenda est, baby.

Congressional Hearing on Why Taiwan Matters

The good news was flickering around the intertubes yesterday....

Here is the hearing announcement. Two panels, names known to anyone who follows US government policy on Taiwan. Good to see June Teufel Dreyer, Rupert Hammond-Chambers and Randall Schriver there.

As I understand it, Formosa Foundation and other pro-Taiwan organizations have been active in trying to get this hearing done. Terri Giles, the Executive Director of the Foundation, writes:
Dear Friends,

We are thrilled to share the news that Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL), Chairman of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, has formally announced that she will hold a full committee hearing on June 16 to call attention to Taiwan’s important to the United States.

For several years, The Formosa Foundation has been in discussions with Ros-Lehtinen about a hearing in Congress on the issue of Taiwan. Earlier this year, I sat down with the Congresswoman who confirmed that she would call a hearing in the House Committee on Foreign Affairs on the subject of "Why Taiwan Matters." Today, she has made it official. I anticipated that the Chairman will speak in detail about the June 16th hearing this Saturday at an event that we are co-hosting in Los Angeles.

We are grateful to Chairman Ros-Lehtinen, one of the greatest supporters of the Taiwanese people in Washington and a champion for democracy and liberty, for bringing this critical issue before Congress and the American people. I hope you can join us in Washington for this special event.

Terri

A friend notes: "If you're not able to attend in person, the event will be available LIVE via WEBCAST link on the Committee website at http://www.hcfa.house.gov/."
_______________________
Don't miss the comments below! And check out my blog and its sidebars for events, links to previous posts and picture posts, and scores of links to other Taiwan blogs and forums! Delenda est, baby.

Thursday, June 09, 2011

ROC General: PRC Army + ROC Army = Chinese Army

Another retired KMT general, another pro-China comment?
Taiwanese media, citing a Chinese media report quoting PLA Major General Luo Yuan (羅援), said a Taiwanese speaker recently told a gathering of retired generals from both sides of the Strait in China: “From now on, we should no longer separate the ROC Army and the PLA. We are all China’s army.”

The report identified the speaker as former ROC Air Force General Hsia Ying-chou (夏瀛洲).

The Ministry of National Defense (MND) yesterday issued a statement saying it had checked with Hsia, who said the media report was “not factual.”

The statement said the ministry had never authorized any group or individual to discuss, exchange views or speak with China on its behalf, adding that any comments made by individuals were said in a “private” capacity.
Read it carefully: does the MND specifically say that the comments were not made? Nope, the way I read it, the MND is not denying that the comments were made, just denying that the general was speaking with official authority. Looks like the general did indeed engage in a bit of Chinese nationalist harrumphing. ADDED: President Ma condemned the alleged remarks.

Letters from Taiwan rounded up some previous instances of military officer visits to Zion the Motherland China. Some of them are especially chilling:
2011 - Nineteen retired Taiwanese intelligence officials last month visited late General Tai Li’s (戴笠) hometown in Jiangshan City (江山市), Zhejiang Province, China, reports said yesterday. The Chinese-language China Times reported that former National Security Bureau chief accountant Lieutenant General Hsu Ping-chiang (徐炳強) and former Military Intelligence Bureau (MIB) official Major General Huang Chi-mei (黃其梅) led 17 retired MIB officials on a visit to Tai’s hometown — the first time former Taiwanese intelligence officials paid a formal visit to China. Tai is known as the father of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) infamous intelligence apparatus during the Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) presidency.
Not only is this habit of retired military officers breaking bread with their Chinese counterparts a problem for Taiwan's military and its democracy, but it has also attracted the worry of the US. These exchanges are one reason the US is reluctant to sell Taiwan its best military gear.

How bad is the problem? The public exchanges of groups of officers that make it into the press don't really get to the heart of the matter. As Lawrence Eyton reported in an excellent and sensitive article on the largely mainlander army and bureaucracy in 2002:
It also follows the release of an alarming statistic by the Ministry of National Defense according to which more than 3,000 former Taiwan military officers are now either doing business or working in "consultancies" in mainland China.
Many more have quiet links to China in other ways, through family doing business there. Indeed in a couple of cases ROC military officers claim they were blackmailed into handing over classified info by some PRC threat to family members doing business in China.
_______________________
Don't miss the comments below! And check out my blog and its sidebars for events, links to previous posts and picture posts, and scores of links to other Taiwan blogs and forums! Delenda est, baby.

AmCham: Taiwan too dependent on China

Those of us who have been following the American Chamber of Commerce's longtime advocacy of closer links between Taiwan and China and adoption of KMT talking points as "analysis" had a good laugh this week as AmCham released its latest White Paper (here) as its director kvetched that Taiwan was too dependent on China and that issues of importance to the foreign business community aren't getting resolved.

Who could have imagined that?

Laudably, AmCham called on Washington to move closer to Taipei and to either resolve or ignore the idiotic beef issue.

The Taipei Times reported:
“Taiwan should pursue greater balance by consolidating its economic connections with such other major markets as Europe, Japan, Southeast Asia and especially the United States, the world’s biggest economy,” AmCham chairman Bill Wiseman told a media briefing on the release of the organization’s annual white paper.

Wiseman’s warning came a few hours before the release of Taiwan’s latest trade data, which showed China accounting for 40.2 percent of exports last month, while the US took only 12.3 percent.

“Over-reliance on one market is always risky,” Wiseman said. “Taiwan should not turn away growth when it can get it, but it needs to lock in the future. It needs to go and start broadening its economic relationships beyond focusing so much on China.”

Taiwan is almost doubly dependent on China, which drove 47 percent of the country’s economic growth last year, sharply higher than the 25 percent average with the G20 nations, he said.
Over-reliance on one market is risky? No kidding? Wasn't that the warning sounded repeatedly by the pro-Taiwan side in the run-up to the 2008 election? Didn't we all know what would happen? Ironically Wiseman's remarks took place even as dependence on China actually fell quarter on quarter, 42.8 percent in the first quarter last year to 40.9 percent of Taiwan's trade over the same period in 2011 (here).

According to the AmCham press release, the White Paper recommended that Taiwan focus on developing its European, Japanese and US markets. But at the same time, it remains strongly supportive of ECFA and urged the government to continue selling out the island opening to China. Laugh at Amcham if you will (and I certainly am!), but it is important to note that in its restrained way AmCham is criticizing its darling Ma Administration for being too focused on China.

Who could have imagined that the Ma Administration would be too focused on China?

The other point they made, also a criticism, relates to the government's resolution of issues important to AmCham.
The organization found that of the 114 issues and sub-issues raised last year, only 14, or 12.3 percent, were resolved or showed satisfactory progress — the lowest in its history of tracking issues seven years ago.
Many of these issues have been around for years.

Time Travel: just for fun I searched my blog for some previous AmCham comments. I've been following AmCham's institutionally pro-KMT stance for quite some time. Remember when AmCham complained that the TSU was gettin' all in their face with ideology? That was in 2006...
The editorial in AmCham's latest issue of TOPICS magazine criticizing the TSU's opposition to closer economic ties with the mainland yesterday infuriated TSU politicians, who warned the chamber against interfering in Taiwan's internal politics.

The editorial even provoked comments from former President Lee Teng-hui according to local news reports.

Vuylsteke said the chamber's stance on closer ties with China was similar to views held by the majority of the public. He warned that too much economic isolation would make Taiwan a nation similar to North Korea or Burma.
Yes, with a million Taiwanese in China at that point, the head of AmCham was worried that Taiwan would become like North Korea or Burma.

From the 2008 White Paper, which was quite reasonable in many ways, came this scolding:
AmCham reiterated its long-held position in favor of eased economic interflows across the Taiwan Strait, with particular reference to expanded non-stop charter flights. If air travel between Taiwan and mainland cities becomes time-saving and convenient, more multinational – and Taiwanese – companies will choose to locate more key personnel and business units in Taiwan for reasons of quality of life, IPR protection, and other rule of law issues, it said. The Chamber called on Beijing to appreciate the special opportunity created by the current political environment in Taiwan, and therefore to respond positively to the Ma administration’s initiatives. In addition, it asked the Taiwan government to take action on measures that it could implement unilaterally, such as removing caps on direct Taiwanese investment in China and on mutual fund investments with China holdings, and eliminating “frivolous” items such as potato chips from the list of products banned from being imported from China.
In 2009 I asked when AmCham was finally going to learn. AmCham was complaining that the government's  plan to lower the cap on credit card rates. The Taipei Times ripped them because of course all of us who are familiar with the KMT's long-term behavior knew precisely what was going to happen. But in that post I quoted my 2007 post...
One of the major problems with Taiwan's economy, from outsider's perspective, is that it is often a game outsiders are not allowed to play. The Chambers of Commerce appear to be of the opinion that this will change if Ma is elected. Lotsa luck, guys. Because after Ma "opens" the economy, AmCham editorials are going to read like this:

"While in principle we welcome the new openness shown by Taiwan during the first two years of President Ma's administration, AmCham wishes to express its growing concern over the preferential treatment given firms from China....."
____________________
Daily Links:
_______________________ 
Don't miss the comments below! And check out my blog and its sidebars for events, links to previous posts and picture posts, and scores of links to other Taiwan blogs and forums! Delenda est, baby.

Freedom House China Media Bulletin Needs Your Help

Freedom House sent this:

+++++++++++++++
As you may know, in November 2010, Freedom House launched the China Media Bulletin, a weekly digest of news and analysis on media freedom issues related to the People's Republic of China.

In the short time since it began publishing, this unique information source has become a must-read item for policymakers, academics, and opinion leaders interested in China's internal dynamics and its rise as a world power. Individuals in Taiwan have been particularly enthusiastic about the bulletin, totaling over 400 of our 1,200 subscribers.

Unfortunately, the CMB is due to run out of publishing funds next month. As such, we are currently trying to raise its profile and alert a wider audience to the need for support to sustain it. If you have found the Bulletin helpful as a source of information and analysis, we would be grateful if you would be willing to share this with a wider circle in order to spread the word.

Thank you very much for your interest in Freedom House's work. More information can be found on its special page http://www.freedomhouse.org/cmb
The donations page is here:
https://org2.democracyinaction.org/o/6580/donate_page/cmb
_______________________
Don't miss the comments below! And check out my blog and its sidebars for events, links to previous posts and picture posts, and scores of links to other Taiwan blogs and forums! Delenda est, baby.