Showing posts with label George Kerr. Show all posts
Showing posts with label George Kerr. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

The Gospel According to Will: Formosa Betrayed

Last week the publicity team for Formosa Betrayed contacted me and asked if I wanted to attend a screening of the new film, due out in Taiwan August 6, and write a review of it. I jumped at the opportunity. Here is the result (Ahoy! Spoilers ahead!):

+++++++++++++

Formosa Betrayed (IMDB)(Official Website)
Produced and written by Will Tiao and Katie Swain
Directed by Adam Kane
Starring James Van Der Beek, Tzi Ma, Will Tiao, John Heard, and Wendy Crewson
103 mins.
DVD: Screen Media, Amazon, or iTunes.

In the great new film Formosa Betrayed producer and writer Will Tiao, a second-generation Taiwanese-American, offers us an unsettling yet emotionally gripping account of an American FBI agent (James van der Beek) accidentally thrust into a 1980s Taiwan in the grip of a police state nightmare, in hot pursuit of gangster hit men who, as he finally comes to understand, are actually agents of the Taiwan government eliminating a pro-democracy critic abroad.

Formosa Betrayed opens with its bloody, shocking ending: a killing in the airport as Kelly, more or less expelled from Taiwan, is leaving the country. The story is told in a series of flashbacks, returning to the ending, then bouncing back to some point in the past to further elaborate. Like Agent Jake Kelly, the viewer has to immerse herself in the tale for a while before she finds a foothold in it. And like Agent Kelly, the viewer will find that much has been learned before the exit is reached.

Back in 1983 when the idea that Taiwan was Free China still lingered like sewer stink on a Taipei street, Agent Kelly finds himself going to Taiwan due to a murder at a university in the US. A Taiwanese economic professor there is killed in an unsubtle professional hit by gangsters. First working under the assumption that the killing is a gangland affair, Kelly gradually realizes that something doesn't add up. Professor Wen, a respected academic, is sending money back to Taiwan -- to the Presbyterian Church. Where are the gangland associates?

Sent to Taiwan to "assist" in the investigation though knowing nothing about the island, Kelly is met by Susan Kane (Wendy Crewson), who describes the ROC in glowing 1950s stereotypes of pro- and anti-Communism. Kane is an obvious authoritarian shill, and while van der Beek does great work, it is Crewson's uncompromising ability to filter out the slightest rationality or sympathy from her character that in my opinion is the best acting job in this movie; she is the foil who enables van der Beek to credibly -- and understatedly -- portray the FBI agent with a conscience. The final shot of her in the movie is brilliant.

Though Formosa Betrayed is conventionally described as a thriller that also introduces some of the issues of Taiwan democracy and independence, and may certainly be enjoyed and understood that way, it is much more than that. What Tiao has done in this film is offered a homage to the Other History of Taiwan. Like Jesus of the Gospels, Agent Kelly moves through allegorical world made sacred, not by redemptive action, but by the lives and deaths of Taiwan activists whose Taiwan abides still, unredeemed. This landscape is then further re-imagined for accessibility to an American audience.

In the shooting of Professor Henry Wen, Tiao makes a double reference to the killer of writer Henry Liu in the US in 1984 by Taiwan gangsters, and to the killing of Professor Chen Wen-chen in 1980 under interrogation in Taipei. Those of us with a passionate interest in Taiwan will also see a reference to the murder of Lin Yi-hsiung's family. The film depicts a completely gratuitous trip to Kaohsiung, where Kelly falls in with a peaceful democracy protest that is brutally assaulted by ROC troops, a clear reference to the Kaohsiung Incident of 1979. Even the title, which refers to George Kerr's famous book of the same name, draws the reader into the beginnings of that world, for the ROC regime on Taiwan would not have been possible without US backing and US material and military support at its inception. This enrichment of the story with these watershed events -- right down to the number of Agent Kelly's room in Taipei -- that gives it a special emotional power for viewers familiar with this history.

Aside from Susan Kane, Kelly moves through the mystery of 1980s Taiwan entirely without a foreign guide. Instead, he meets a series of Taiwanese who draw him ever more deeply into the authoritarian reality that lies behind the facade of ROC sophistication and Free China "democracy". The beauty of this approach is that it leaves Kelly, like the movie-goer, alone to fish for his own truths in this sea of Taiwanese. Tiao and Swain thus permit the Taiwanese to tell their story of Taiwan to Kelly in their own way, passionate, moving, and informative. A wonderful shot in the Kaohsiung protest scene visually emphasizes Kelly's singular and uncertain position in the world he has entered.

Knowledgeable viewers will probably have many issues with the movie. Tiao's portrait of 1980s Taiwan is overwrought. Police and military did not crowd the streets with automatic rifles and checkpoints on every corner. The period of political killings was largely over, though suspicious deaths would occur into the 1980s. Torture was not often as blatant as it is shown in the movies; ROC torturers generally preferred methods that did not leave marks, such as waterboarding. But American audiences, who largely do not understand how police states function, such over-the-top portraiture is probably necessary. The closeted independence supporters Kelly meets in high positions in the KMT police state will also not be credible to knowledgeable viewers, though they are probably necessary to tell the story, and the pro-ROC types are recognizable caricatures, no doubt another necessity. Yet it should also be recalled, when the ROC officials smear Professor Wen (ridiculously) as a Moriarity-style gangster mastermind, that such claims were SOP. Recall too that future KMT heavyweight James Soong was in charge of the propaganda drive during the 1979 Kaohsiung Incident, claiming that 180 police but no protesters were injured (similar claims were made again, three decades later, about the Chen Yunlin protests). If what happens in the movie sounds stilted to certain US critics, it is probably because they lack experience with just how absurdly transparent ROC propaganda can be.

Historical issues abound. Formosa Betrayed was filmed in Thailand to stand in for Taiwan, and has the wrong feel, even for the time period. There is a shot of a metro in the film, years too early, that adds nothing to the story and should probably be removed, and a reference to the missiles aimed at Taiwan years before they showed up in large numbers. Perhaps these are part of the way the film telescopes past and present, but I found them jarring, nonetheless.

Most importantly, the final frame of the film leaves the viewer with the profoundly erroneous claim that 23 nations recognize "Taiwan". These nations actually recognize the ROC: no nation on earth recognizes Taiwan as a country. That really is the whole point of Formosa Betrayed: after all these sacrifices, we're still not there yet. That line needs to be changed ASAP, since it manages to be factually incorrect while at the same time threatening to undermine everything Tiao is trying to say. Simply end with something like: Today no nation on earth recognizes Taiwan as an independent state.

Filmed on a modest $8 million budget, about an issue little known in the US, lacking a big-name actor, Formosa Betrayed will probably not win any Oscars. But it represents a series of important and enjoyable firsts for a movie about Taiwan: a movie about Taiwan politics, told from a Taiwan-centered point of view, for an audience that needs to hear that as often and as loudly as possible. Hopefully, it will be the first of many such films.

And hey, if the politics get in the way, you can still sit down with that gargantuan tub of popcorn and an oversize coke that could water a small farm, kick back in front of the big screen, and spend a couple of hours savoring a solid thriller with some great moments of humor and pathos, enough blood to give it an "R" rating, and -- like Taiwan itself -- a shrouded, unsettled finish.
_______________________
Don't miss the comments below! And check out my blog and its sidebars for events, links to previous posts and picture posts, and scores of links to other Taiwan blogs and forums!

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

George Kerr Obit from scholarly perspective

kerr

Jon Benda over at Notes of a Former Native Speaker flipped me No 52 of The Ryukyuanist, a newsletter about Okinawan studies scholars. In it is an obit for George Kerr, the author of Formosa Betrayed and Formosa: Licensed Revolution and the Home Rule Movement, 1895-1945. Because there is no text conversion, I'm forced to display it as a .jpg. Enjoy!
_______________________
Don't miss the comments below! And check out my blog and its sidebars for events, links to previous posts and picture posts, and scores of links to other Taiwan blogs and forums!

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

Formosa Betrayed and Kerr's Original Memo

Most of you are familiar with George Kerr's brilliant and angry account of the looting of Taiwan by the Chiang Kai-shek government, Formosa Betrayed, which is online in a couple of places. Taiwanophile Andrew Leonard, who writes a regular column at Salon.com, discusses a post at Frog in a Well that scanned Kerr's original memo on the 2-28 massacre. Leonard writes:

This is an astonishing document: 23 pages of typewritten manuscript marked up with notations in the margins and handwritten corrections. It positively reeks of history. "Formosa Betrayed" is an angry book, but its publication came nearly 20 years after the events that make up its heart. Kerr's memo is dated April 21, 1947 -- just a month and a half after Kerr personally witnessed machine-gun fire mowing down unarmed protesters. I have talked to people whose relatives died in that crackdown, and I have watched moving films made about the massacre decades later, but nothing I've ever experienced packs the emotional wallop of Kerr's memo.

After some initial rioting sparked by discontent at the policies put into place by the KMT, and the pistol-whipping of a black-market-cigarette vendor, Chen Yi, the governor general appointed by Chiang Kai-shek, met with a Settlement Committee representing the aggrieved population. But his conciliatory gestures were just a play for time as he waited for thousands of troops from the mainland to arrive. As soon as they disembarked, mass slaughter began.


Leonard posts an excerpt from the memo:

Beginning March 9, there was widespread and indiscriminate killing. Soldiers were seen bayonetting coolies without apparent provocation in front of a Consulate staff residence. Soldiers were seen to rob passersby. An old man protesting the removal of a woman from his house was cut down by two soldiers. The Canadian nurse in charge of an adjacent Mission Hospital was observed bravely to make seven trips under fire into the crowded area across the avenue to treat persons shot down or bayonetted, and once as she supervised the movement of a wounded man into the hospital the bearers with her were fired upon. Some of the patients brought in had been shot and hacked to pieces. Young Formosan men were observed tied together, being prodded at bayonet point toward the city limits. A Formosan woman primary school teacher attempting to reach her home was shot in the back and robbed near the Mission compound. A British business man attempting to rescue an American woman whose house was being riddled with machine gun fire from a nearby emplacement was fired upon and narrowly escaped, one bullet cutting through his clothing and another being deflected from the steering gear of his jeep. Another foreigner saw a youth forced to dismount from his cycle before a military policeman, who thereupon lacerated the man's hands so badly with his bayonet that the man could not pick up his machine ...

By March 17 the order of seizure or execution seemed to have become, successively, all established critics of the government, Settlement Committee members and their aides, men who had taken part in the interim policing of Taipei, middle school students and teachers, lawyers, economic leaders and members of influential families, and finally, persons who in the past had caused members of the Government or their appointees serious loss of face. On March 16 it was rumored that anyone who spoke English well or who had close foreign connections was being seized "for examination," and that many Japanese technicians in the employ of the Government were being taken.


In addition to Formosa Betrayed, another eyewitness account is also online: Alan Shackleton's heartbreaking account entitled Formosa Calling.

During the morning we saw several groups of prisoners brought in with ropes around their necks. One of the prisoners was standing by himself at an entrance-way trussed up with wire which tied his two wrists together behind his back. The wire had been screwed so tightly that it was buried in the flesh. A similar arrangement with wire brought his two upper arms closely together and he also had a rope around his neck. He looked in the last stages of exhaustion and could barely stand up, but every time his head drooped the guard clipped him under the nose with the back of the bayonet which was fastened to the end of the rifle. My interpreter thought it was our friend, one of the leaders of the people's group who had been very concerned that there should be no fighting. I did not think so, but my interpreter maintained that I did not make allowances for the harrowing experiences that the man had undergone. For one thing, he certainly was very much thinner. Nevertheless, no matter who he was, it was a shock to see a man so treated. We discussed whether we could do anything about the matter but decided that, if we showed any interest in the man, it would probably only bring him more trouble at the hands of the military.

Why does the DPP want to rename the memorial to Chiang Kai-shek in downtown Taipei? This mass killing is one of the (innumerable) reasons.

UPDATED: Kerr actually wrote the book in conjunction with UNRRA official Ed Paine. Here is a partial tale of Paine.

Sunday, February 11, 2007

Brookings Symposium on 2-28

Gerrit van der Wees from FAPA passed this around. Wish I could go!

+++++++++++++

Dear friends in TaiwanFocus,

To commemorate the 60th anniversaty of 228 incident of 1947, FAPA and the Brookings Institution have organized a 228 Symposium titled "Looking Back, Moving Forward"on Thursday, February 22nd, from 2:00 to 5:00 pm.. The Symposium will be held at the Brookings Institution in Washington DC. Below is a summary of the program.

The main theme of the meeting will be to underline the importance of 228 in the understanding of present-day Taiwan. As you see, we have two excellent Taiwanese speakers -- Prof. Peng Ming-min from Taiwan, and Prof. Lin Tsung-kuang from Iowa -- as well as several excellent and supportive American speakers: Richard Bush (who will discuss The role of George Kerr, author of Formosa Betrayed), Prof. Steve Phillips of Towson University, Randy Schriver (topic: The importance of the 228 for present-day US policymaking), and Mrs. Priscilla Hayner (an expert on transitional justice -- who will speak on Historical memory; possibilities and requirements for reconciliation).

We urge you to attend this important event. Seating is limited, so Brookings is asking everyone who plans to attend to sign up through its website at http://www.brookings.edu/comm/events/20070222.htm


Taiwan's 228 Incident:

The Political Implications of February 28, 1947

Thursday, February 22, 2007
2:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m.


The Brookings Institution

Falk Auditorium
1775 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Washington, DC


On February 28, 1947, the arrest of a cigarette vendor in Taipei led to large-scale protests by the native Taiwanese against the corruption and repression of Chiang Kai-shek's Chinese Nationalist government, which had come over from China after Japan's defeat by the Allied forces in 1945. Following the protests, troops that Chiang's government secretly sent from mainland China rounded up and executed an entire generation of leading figures, including students, lawyers, and doctors. Scholars estimate that up to 28,000 lost their lives in the turmoil. During the "White Terror" of the subsequent years, the Nationalists ruled Taiwan under martial law, which ended only when democratization set in during the mid-1980s. The "228 Incident" remains a defining event in the political divide that exits in Taiwan today.

On February 22, the Center for Northeast Asian Policy Studies (CNAPS) and the Formosan Association for Public Affairs (FAPA) will host a discussion with leading experts to examine the importance of the "228 Incident" to the understanding of present-day Taiwan, and the process of reconciliation on the island. Chen-Wen Yen, executive director of the Formosan Association for Public Affairs, will moderate the first panel looking back on this historic event. CNAPS Director Richard Bush will moderate a second panel focusing on moving forward. A short clip of a documentary film will be shown between the two panels. An audience question and answer period will follow each discussion.

Panel One: Looking Back

Panelists:
Richard Bush
Senior Fellow and Director, CNAPS
The Brookings Institution

Peng Ming-Min
Advisor to the President
Taiwan

Steven Phillips
Associate Professor of History
Towson University

Panel Two: Moving Forward
Panelists:
Priscilla Hayner
Director, International Policy Unit International Center for Transitional Justice

Tsung-Kuang Lin
Professor of History
Drake University

Randall Schriver
Partner
Armitage International LLC

RSVP: Please call the Brookings Office of Communications, 202/797-6105
or register online at http://onlinepressroom.net/brookings/