++++++++++++++
Ma undermining Taiwan’s democracy and security
Two recent events show that the Ma Administration is quickly earning itself the label of being a trouble-maker and is letting the courts and the Legislative Yuan undermine the island’s hard-earned democracy.
First, the political uproar generated by the provocative comments of Prime Minister Liu Chao-shiuan and the reckless actions by extremist KMT legislators: in response to the accidental sinking of a Taiwanese recreational fishing boat in the waters near the Tiaoyutai/Senkakus, Prime Minister Liu let himself be goaded by the KMT legislators into saying that he “doesn’t exclude war” with Japan over the incident.
While he later retracted the statement, the events do display the rather unbalanced thinking of the Ma Administration on the issue of Taiwan’s sovereignty and security: they seem to want to “defend the nation’s sovereignty” over a fishing boat and a piece of rock, but Mr. Ma neglected to mention Taiwan’s sovereignty in his inaugural address and it was whitewashed in the recent meetings with China.
The Ma Administration could have tried to determine what actually happened. They would have found out that the boat from Taiwan was there against the 12 mile zone agreement between Taiwan and Japan, and that the captain was unnecessarily endangering the lives of his crewmembers.
Instead of letting the legal authorities handle it (like the Japanese did in a very evenhanded way), the KMT authorities made a political issue out of it, and even recalled the Taiwanese representative in Tokyo. That was a very unwise political move, because it estranges Taiwan from its closest ally in the region. In doing so, he seriously undermines Taiwan’s security.
In addition, at home Mr. Ma is undermining Taiwan’s democracy and is fostering the corruption that he says he so much abhors: the judicial authorities are pressing charges against former President Chen Shui-bian in relation to a “slander suit” brought against the former President and two DPP legislators, one of which is presently still serving in the Legislative Yuan.
The case stems from remarks made by the President and the two legislators in 2005, stating that retired vice admiral Lei Hsueh-ming, retired rear admiral Wang Chin-shen and three others were involved in a 1988-1992 kick-back scheme in the purchase of French-made Lafayette frigates. The two navy officers held key positions under former Defense Minister Hau Pei-tsun when the decision was made to switch from a purchase from South Korea to France.
According to former French Foreign Minister Roland Dumas, some US$ 500 million in kickbacks were paid by Thompson CSF, US$ 400 million through the office of the KMT secretariat general, then headed by Mr. James Soong. During his term in office, President Chen tried to get court authorities to investigate the case and prosecute those who were found guilty, but this was stonewalled by the KMT-dominated courts.
So, by allowing the slander suit against the former President to move ahead, Mr. Ma is undermining democracy and is not taking the necessary action against those who were involved in corruption on a large scale. A fair and just judicial system should take legal action against corrupt practices, not against whistle blowers.
The people of Taiwan have worked hard to achieve Taiwan’s security and democracy. It would be foolish for it to be squandered away by provocative words and reckless actions of the Ma Administration and ultra Chinese-Nationalist KMT legislators.
Gerrit van der Wees is editor of Taiwan Communiqué, a publication based in
Washington DC
++++++++++++++
[Taiwan]
9 comments:
I've read about the 12 mile agreement, but where can I find the actual agreement document online? I've searched thru the fishing harbor act, etc, but haven't found anything yet... My friends on chinese-forums are skeptical of anything from taipei times, unfortunately. Help!
Ma has f-ed up royally... and so soon. As I said before, if he can come through with a miraculous new economy, then most Taiwanese won't notice. But this can be nothing but a royal f-up.
How many Taiwanese have you ever met that give a hoot about the Diaoyutais? Some extremists do, but the China issue is much more important. Ma has made a huge deal about some rocks that everyone knows Taiwan has no way in hell to defend, yet has given so much so fast to the Chinese. It almost sounds like overcompensation. Ma gets to look tough on sovereignty without offending China. But in doing, he offends an ally.
Wasn't he supposed to pursue more rational policies?
Well Thomas...
if you thought Ma would be "calm and rational", you need look no further than his boss Lien Chan. Lien is the guru of orchestrating calmness and rationality.
I can't believe this is all happening in a month (not even!) after Ma officially became the president (or Mister Ma as he wants to be known)...this presents a really bleak future for Taiwan...
I hear you, Thomas--a royal f-up indeed. In average, each Taiwanese is losing a whole lotta money!
But wait, when the next elections come, they'll probably forget... thanks to the KMT's traditional red envelopes.
How many Taiwanese have you ever met that give a hoot about the Diaoyutais? Some extremists do, but the China issue is much more important. Ma has made a huge deal about some rocks that everyone knows Taiwan has no way in hell to defend, yet has given so much so fast to the Chinese. It almost sounds like overcompensation. Ma gets to look tough on sovereignty without offending China. But in doing, he offends an ally.
I don't know, US seem to be very happy with what Ma did. Btw, Japan is our puppet, so don't worry about Japan to much. Japanese is still paying for the loss 50 years ago. Also, I thought you guys said Ma haven't show himself that much where the offense coming from.
If this piece is not from a Washington lobbyist group, it actually be worth something.
"If this piece is not from a Washington lobbyist group, it actually be worth something."
This is a case of arty trying to distract the reader from the real issue at hand, which is: Does Mr. Van der Wees make a valid point. The answer is "yes!"
Gerrit is know for being intellectual and pragmatic concerning Taiwan issues. Furthermore, he uses solid primary and secondary sources to back up his assertions, which is more that can be said for some people.
Last, the Taiwan Communique is not a lobby group. FAPA is the international grassroots organization consisting of Taiwanese and Taiwan supporters, which encourages citizens to lobby for Taiwan.
arty,
If you started employing sources of the same quality as Mr van der Wees, you might find your writing a little more respected around here. Bulletgate logic doesn't go very far.
If you started employing sources of the same quality as Mr van der Wees
What sources did he use and cite? I don't see any footnote and citation. Last time I cited something, one is from the Taiwan government official site, and another one is from Kyoto University library. Of the two sources, none of you guys answered to the questions that I raised from them.
Sure, if FAPA is not a lobbying group than some of the labor unions are not either. Also, where did its money come from? I guess these days certainly not from the Taiwan government. I used to work for non-profit you know (Americorp volunteer).
arty is simply a chinese ideological troll. he claims he strictly identifies as american, yet from his parroting of lines from taiwanese pan-blue media, we know he bothers to read/watch chinese language media, and pan-blue media, at that.
Post a Comment