Friday, March 28, 2008

The Politics of 6th Grade: Contested English

Yesterday was all Elementary English day. First, I got invited out to one of the better local elementary schools near my house. It was the leading elementary school in its part of the world, but last year a horrible thing had happened: none of their kids had finished in the upper tier of the English storytelling and reading competitions at the county level, for the first time. This was absolutely mortifying for a proud school that dates back to the early days of the Japanese period, and being good businessmen, they swung into action and hired a consultant, none other than your trusty writer. That they would take such an extraordinary step shows how important such contests are to the self-image, and the public image, of the schools. They paid well, too.

After I heard their story, I couldn't help but ask why they thought I was necessary, since it appeared to be a one-time thing. I suppose as a good consultant I should be emphasizing how much they needed me, but it was obvious they didn't. The English teacher had a wonderful faint trill to her English, and was vivacious and friendly, not to mention totally competent. My age (23 these many years), she had grown up in Argentina. She too felt I wasn't needed, but orders were orders....so we went to work.

I was hired because I regularly judge the Taichung county speech contests, and because I could communicate with the locals in Chinese. And I supposed because I was foreign and therefore "know English" -- although knowledge of English was not really the issue, it was figuring out how to shape the presentations to the judging guidelines. Me having been a judge was thus important. For the storytelling this wasn't really a problem, I had lots of good suggestions. It was the reading section that was the puzzler. Did lots of work on intonation and vowels....

Part of the problem is that while the content is English, everything else is Sinified. The "right" way to do it is the way everyone else does it. The students present the stories using exactly the same intonation and movements as they use when they present Chinese content (what other model is there?). The effect is insomniac, especially reading, which should on no account be judged while sober. Further deadening effects come from the presentation guidelines, which permit no deviation from content, so no creative subversion of the story is permissible -- the three little pigs always kill the wolf, the enormous turnip is inevitably pulled up, and the gingerbread man never escapes from his bad end. So let it be written, so let it be done.

Got home from that to encounter English in another way. One problem people have constantly complained about since the reforms that began here in late 1990s is the perceived fall-off in textbook quality. My daughter took her English exam this week and got 99. She missed a point on the English Comprehension section, a true-false question that asked about the brothers of Mary, though no information had been presented in the text on any brothers. Textbook quality strikes again! My daughter had shrugged and guessed (one aspect of the shaping that takes place at this level is the accommodation of the growing self to the arbitrariness of the testing system). Part of it was the teacher who had simply copied the questions wholesale out of the textbook, part of it was the reluctance of teachers to give 100 even when deserved. So my daughter was all upset over having missed this point, having internalized already the capital importance of tests, and my wife had another go-round with the teacher, who had done the same thing previously with the same kind of error and the same result. Finally the teacher called my daughter yesterday and my daughter was awarded the point.....

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

"...one aspect of the shaping that takes place at this level is the accommodation of the growing self to the arbitrariness of the testing system..."

And thus, later, to (a) arbitrary (and often inane) authority and (b) to the "Don't think too much" mantra.

Love these posts you write from the classroom trenches... I mean, rows. Fascinating stuff with great insights!

Anonymous said...

Ack! Too many tests. What do you learn from test taking except how to take tests? :P Blah

Anonymous said...

Taiwanese kids, and especially university students, are appalling at 'test behavior'. Most grasp that to pass an exam just vomit facts onto paper, then leave the classroom pronto - ideally after 30 minutes of the 75 minute paper! This sort of thing leaves me of the opinion the young Taiwanese don't know how to do tests, they are not taught to, but they know enough what the system wants of them to pass. However if the tests engaged in thinking skills rather than fact remembering skills then it would be interesting to see the outcome.

Michael Fahey said...

Lol. Great post. The mind boggles. You brought back painful memories of a few horrible speech contests I judged back in the 1990s. I used to think that these competitions were held to ensure that no one would ever want to speak in public.

Michael Turton said...

Taiwanese kids are as creative and smart as any. Don't undersell them.

John Naruwan said...

I've come across this blind faith in the printed word even when it's obviously wrong so many times. I once proofread an English text book which had stuff in there which must have been from the '50s, doubtless written by some crumbly old Taiwanese English professor with academic credentials coming out of his arse but no actual clue how to speak or teach English. And yet there it was in this new and updated text book. How? It's written down in a book, so it must be true. It's a complete denial of fallibility. Taiwanese, in my experience, really don't feel confortable questioning the veracity of something they may harbor secret doubts about. Better to keep your head down or insist forever that it must be true because after all there it is in black and white. Think about Chinese medicine. Some wispy-bearded gits coupla thousand years ago write down that, oh I don't know, slug gonads cure headaches, and for the next 2000 plus years to the present people are still gobbling down slug balls when they have a headache.

Anonymous said...

It is heartwarming to know your daughter got the point. I can only wonder what 'face' had to do with this teacher's behavior. Will she correct her test composition practices?

Anonymous said...

naruwan said: Think about Chinese medicine. Some wispy-bearded gits coupla thousand years ago write down that, oh I don't know, slug gonads cure headaches, and for the next 2000 plus years to the present people are still gobbling down slug balls when they have a headache

In noting your comparison of English textbook and Chinese Medicine, it's evident you don't know JACK about Chinese Medicine

John Naruwan said...

Marc said: "In noting your comparison of English textbook and Chinese Medicine, it's evident you don't know JACK about Chinese Medicine."

You're missing the point. What I'm saying is that few Taiwanese are openly skeptical about TCM, and one of the reaonss for this is their apparently unshakable faith that ancient texts about TCM are infallible.

Anonymous said...

Always puzzles me why students 'expect' to get 100 on quizzes. Students in my school after three or four years of English (and the best students!) get little more than 90% and 80-85% is common.

We're always tempering our students' expectations. Our tests are difficult but very do-able, and we rarely include items in the tests that haven't been explicitly presented.