A friend alerts me: Great decline in Taiwan exports and imports last month. From the Ministry of Finance:
"For the month of Apr. 2015, total exports contracted 11.7% year on year to US$ 23.49 billion. However, total imports fell 22.1% from a year earlier to US$ 18.73 billion. The trade balance of this month was favorable, amounting to US$4.76 billion."Exports to Europe and ASEAN-6 fell, reflecting the slower growth in both regions.
In Apr. 2015, comparing with the same month of last year, exports to Japan and U.S.A. rose by 9.3% and 1.2% respectively, however exports to Mainland China and Hong Kong, ASEAN-6 and Europe declined 12.2%, 18.9% and 21.6% separately.But particularly interesting, my friend notes, is the 12.2% drop of exports to China and the 10.2% drop of imports from China. Combined with the "unexpected" fall of 6.4% in exports and 16.2% imports in China (via Reuters), the not-so-smooth landing of the Chinese economy is starting to have some serious effects.
But as my friend points out
Yet the imports from China drop less than from other regions, meaning that ECFA did its job in replacing ever more Taiwan local production and imports from elsewhere with made-in-China products.I've reproduced Table 5 showing imports....
My friend then observes that this new economic reality of Chinese slow down is the reason that the CCP and KMT are pushing to move from the "economic benefits" phase of the KMT's China engagement to the "political talks" phase. The economic benefits, which went only to big businesses anyway, are gone. If economic benefits were the reason to annex Taiwan to China, there's no reason now, and no support for it among the populace. "Peace accords" --likely annexation in all but name -- will be next.
Just think about it an alternate universe where Lien-Soong wins in 2004. The 2004-8 period was the golden age of Taiwanese investment and manufacturing in China. Imagine what treaties they could have passed then, when things were booming. Chen Shui-bian's victory in 2004 was a major turning point in Taiwan history, probably saved Taiwan from a much worse fate than the ugly ECFA agreement.
WSJ "blog" with piece on how opposition to "free trade" is hurting Taiwan's exports. Can we stop writing as if this simpleminded dichotomy "for free trade or against the services pact" is really something other than ideological spew? To wit:
Taiwan’s exporters could soon face another challenge: local opposition to further free trade with China.What silliness! Everyone on the island is pro-trade liberalization. In the real world, some pacts are good and some are not. Claiming that being against the services pact is the same as being against free trade is like arguing that because I dislike Risk I must hate boardgames. What kind of world is it where this has to be explained? Srsly!
Taiwan already is heavily dependent on China, which sucks in 40% of its exports. Many Taiwanese work on the mainland. Currently, the territory has a limited free-trade agreement with its neighbor, which the ruling Kuomintang party wants to extend to cover up to 5,000 items and services.
But protests against the deal last year, led by students, shut down Taiwan’s parliament and put such trade liberalization on the backburner. Many in Taiwan feel further dependence on China will erode its independence and give ballast to China’s claims on Taiwan’s sovereignty.
The problem for Taiwan is that rivals like South Korea are pushing ahead with their own deals with Beijing. Southeast Asia and China already have a trade pact.
The purpose of ECFA and the services pact are to hollow out the Taiwan economy and boost exports from China to Taiwan, as well as provide a channel for Chinese people to flood into Taiwan. It's not difficult to figure out that these are not "free trade" pacts. The island's exports are in the doldrums because the US and Europe are down, not because the services pact -- a trade treaty so crappy even legislators from its own party wouldn't support it and the KMT had to try to get into law without a vote -- was blocked by the students.
Note that the WSJ blames the students. It says nothing about the opposition from within the KMT. That's another political fallout of this mindless four legs good, two legs bad kind of thinking: it covers up the fact that the treaty was supported by the KMT leadership and big business and nobody else. Indeed, neither ECFA nor the services ever achieved majority support in credible independent polls. But why let facts stand in the way of ideological posturing?
Finally, the clearest marker of ideological blindness: the writer presents no concrete evidence that defeating the services pact has negatively affected Taiwan's external trade. Ma himself said it would create only 12,000 jobs, while the Chung-hua Institute for Economist Research said GDP would grow by an awesome 0.025-0.034 percent. What a shame those anti-free trade students are preventing us from getting those incredible benefits, eh?
- HUGE: Taipei city recommends that President Ma face prosecution over Taipei Dome project, also recommends that Min of Justice, not Special Investigative Division, carry out investigation/prosecution. The SID is widely seen by pan-Greens as a tool of Ma...
- ALSO BIG: KMT heavyweight Wang Jin-pyng is going to run for President, announcement on Tuesday, according to Storm Media report.
- Yay! KMT news organ: Tsai's position on Status Quo is identical to US position. Good news, she's selling the position properly.
- WantWant tries to explain away Chu's lack of any real benefits from trip to China
- Taiwan's problem -- too many graduates, not enough machinists
- Taiwan Insider from Thinking Taiwan
[Taiwan] Don't miss the comments below! And check out my blog and its sidebars for events, links to previous posts and picture posts, and scores of links to other Taiwan blogs and forums!