Sunday, September 18, 2011

Sunday shorts: F-16 deftness, DPP media Follies

On the F-16 denial..... the Obama Administration has shown a bit of cleverness. Note that the WH has not made an official and public announcement that Taiwan is getting only upgrades, not new aircraft. The news has been leaked again and again over the last few months, so everyone knows what the situation is. But for those wondering what Beijing's reaction is going to be... what exactly is there for Beijing to react TO? After all, the Administration is merely talking to Congress. Nobody in the Administration has said anything, nothing is well defined, only one or two Congressmen have held press conferences to complain. Very interesting the way its been handled. The question is whether it was intentionally handled in this way.

And, just to remind you, doncha just love the way that years of KMT opposition to the F-16 sale has gone right down the memory hole since Ma came to power?

As for Beijing, if their foreign policymakers are smart, they will do nothing but make the usual pro forma noises. The Chinese reaction will be a good test of whether arrogance is running ahead of brains in Beijing.

AP sexed up the title and point of view of its most recent piece on Tsai Ing-wen: Taiwan opposition chief open to China unification. The reality was actually laid out in the piece itself:
"I've said I do not exclude any possibility," Tsai was quoted as saying when asked whether she is open to unification with China. "As long as there is public support, Taiwan and China's future relations can remain open (to any possibility)."

Tsai's condition appears to be a difficult one to fulfill, at least for now. Taiwanese public opinion polls consistently show that only a small minority of the island's 23 million people support unification with China.
It was kind of AP to rely that reality in the piece as well as Tsai's "condition" (which is not a condition but the very essence of democracy).

AP described Tsai's position as a "radical departure" which is -- not to put too fine a point on it -- utter bullshit. Things must have been high pressured there at the AP office for them to have forgotten that it is DPP boilerplate to say that the Party would support annexing Taiwan to China if its people did, and for them not have found the time to run a few Google searches for past statements on the topic that suggest a similar flexibility. For example from 2004:
TIME: Do you accept the idea of eventual unification with China?Chen: Currently, there are two separate, independent countries across the Taiwan Strait, neither of which has jurisdiction over the other. But who knows if these two separate countries might become one over time? We do not exclude any possibilities for the future.
Chen made such statements several times (Chen in Der Spiegel 2007, Figaro 2006, even LTH 1996). Other DPP politicians have been all over the map -- anyone remember the Shen Fu-hsiung's proposal for a China-Taiwan commonwealth? But I guess DPP Candidate Makes Boilerplate Answer to Silly Repetitive Query is a less interesting headline.... and I guess, after seven years of operating this blog, I should be expecting constructions like this. It's pretty clear that the next few months of the Tsai campaign is going to be a media shitstorm, if this week is any guide. UPDATE: The Tsai campaign criticized AP's "overinterpretation" and located Tsai's remarks in the long tradition of DPP boilerplate that AP was too lazy to go out and find.

In a related tale, I am saddened to report that the DPP ham-handedness with the western media, which we saw so often in the 2008 presidential campaign, is alive and well in the current rendition of the DPP campaign. I am told that a major western media outlet, with major reporter, was looking to interview Tsai during her trip to the US. Somehow, the senior level DPP media handlers couldn't make it happen. Heads need to be thumped over there -- Tsai was not interviewed by any major media publication in the US, which should have been considered mandatory. How can Tsai fix relations with the US if the US doesn't know she exists?

Some other things -- I spent the latter half of August and the beginning of September running around the nation and talking to people. Taichung is the center of the island's live music scene. I met younger people all over the island who are in bands, or have friends in bands, and who are peeved at KMT mayor Jason Hu for disrupting Taichung's bar scene over the last few months. Central Taiwan is judged by both parties to be a major battleground.....
_______________________
Don't miss the comments below! And check out my blog and its sidebars for events, links to previous posts and picture posts, and scores of links to other Taiwan blogs and forums! Delenda est, baby.http://news.yahoo.com/taiwan-opposition-chief-open-china-unification-072409796.html

6 comments:

Dixteel said...

Humm...I am wondering though if missing the interview is such a big deal. Not a lot of people in the US understand or care about Taiwan's situation. An interview with a major media such as CNN might not get the effect you are expecting, considering the time constraints, the complicated matters, the editing and the extra comments added by the mainstream reporters, who usually take the "Chinese Civil War" view points, as shown in the past. I am not sure if such an interview is useful. Good communication with those who are more familiar with the issues is more important right now IMO.

Anonymous said...

the taipei times reported the other day that the kmt denied rejecting the budget for f-16 66 times during chen sui-bian years. they flat out denied voting against it at all. is the press or dpp calling them out on that? cuz how can they lie about it when it can be easily proven they did vote against it - 66 times??

Readin said...

"Humm...I am wondering though if missing the interview is such a big deal. Not a lot of people in the US understand or care about Taiwan's situation."

They don't understand or care about it because they don't hear about it. Out of sight, out of mind. (invisible insanity)

"An interview with a major media such as CNN might not get the effect you are expecting, considering the time constraints, the complicated matters, the editing and the extra comments added by the mainstream reporters, who usually take the "Chinese Civil War" view points, as shown in the past"
That is a valid concern, but what little people do hear about Taiwan already has that bias. At least in a longer format some of the other side might come out.
When Taiwan has gotten extensive coverage in the past 20 years, it seems to have helped Taiwan's image a lot. People seemed to sympathize a lot with Taiwan's plight during the missile tests.

"Good communication with those who are more familiar with the issues is more important right now IMO."

Those who are more familiar with the issues tend to have their own agendas - and those agendas, usually focused on making money - tend to be short-sighted and pro-China. So long as the American public ignores Taiwan, those special-interests will control the policy. Only when the American public hear enough about the situation to form and register opinions will the US government start listening to the public who - being generally decent people with no stake in pleasing either Taiwan or China - will judge the situation fairly and be pro-Taiwan.

Michael Turton said...

Anon, they didnt reject the budget. They prevented the issue from reaching the floor.

Anonymous said...

Michael, you do a great service to us all when you look back at the historical record like that. This is like Daily Show-quality material! (Which is a compliment)

What's so crazy is Taiwan asked for BOTH upgrades and new F-16s and submarines, and somehow the issue is now:

Upgrades or New F-16s

and being spun as upgrades are a good compromise.

What?!

Actually looking out for Taiwan would mean selling Taiwan F-35s so that they have a *next* generation fighter that is competitive with China's up and coming fighters. Selling F-16s is selling a very good, very cheap, and very versatile, but unfortunately aging aircraft.

Only providing F-16s, even new ones, was already a compromise, but they've moved the goal post to the old compromise and called the new one yet another compromise as if the old one didn't even happen...

Wake the fuck up State Department! Appeasement never works.

paul said...

@michael. ok kmt rejected the f-16 issue from reaching legislature floor - 66 times. they REJECTED it from being discussed, so it is still rejection. is dr. tsai and dpp making this into a huge campaign issue? it was mentioned just once in taipei times. i hope it's being repeated over and over in the taiwanese newspapers/media!!!