Wednesday, June 03, 2015

Is the ship of State making a majestic turn?

Picking over a plowed field.

A friend of mine flagged this passage in the recent State Department briefing on the visit of Tsai Ing-wen to the US. It uses some interesting language...

QUESTION: Yes. A couple, Taiwan.

MS HARF: Uh-huh.

QUESTION: As you know, the opposition – the head of the opposition party in Taiwan, Ms. Tsai Ing-wen, visited here with United States.

MS HARF: Will be visiting, I think.

QUESTION: Here in this town, yeah.

MS HARF: In the – yes, correct.

QUESTION: Yes, yes. And does any U.S. official, including State Department and White House, plan to meet her?

MS HARF: Well, we certainly welcome her visit and look forward to a productive exchange. I don’t have a full outline of her meetings yet. I believe there are some that will be planned with U.S. officials, but I don’t have that in front of me. So I think the schedule’s still being worked.

QUESTION: Yeah. Are you concerned any Chinese reaction after the meeting, if somebody meet her?

MS HARF: Well, we – look, we have an interest in a comprehensive, durable, and mutually beneficial partnership with Taiwan. But that is fully consistent with our One China policy, and that’s something we’ve said consistently, that’s based on the three joint communiques, and the Taiwan Relations Act. So we believe you can support Taiwan’s security and freedom from coercion, you can promote Taiwan’s economic prosperity, and help people in Taiwan enjoy the respect they deserve in the international community while supporting at the same time our policy that hasn’t changed. We believe we can do both.
Well, he pointed out, this is the same language Tsai Ing-wen used in her WSJ piece the other day, the idea of partnership. Interestingly, the language Ms. Harf used today is almost verbatim from Deputy Asst Secretary in the East Asia/Pacific Affairs Bureau Susan Thornton's speech in mid-May:
"...comprehensive, durable, and mutually beneficial partnership with Taiwan.
Does new language signal new policy? Maybe. One effect, historically, of the US drawing closer to China is that Taiwan gets denigrated. Now the pendulum is swinging the other way: as the US increasingly confronts China, Taiwan's status is going to get an upgrade. This may also mean that anti-Taiwan individuals in the government and punditocracy aren't going to get as much of a hearing as they used to, a very good thing. Much depends on how Tsai handles things...

Meanwhile my friend Les alerts me to the fact that Ma is terrorized by the Tsai Ing-wen visit and the thought that she might change US policy, and so is rushing off to the US in July to see if he can spread the One True Gospel of Return to China in Washington. Alas, it isn't 2007 anymore, no one believes in Ma's competence and pragmatism except the toadies who surround him. Alas, China's belligerence and inability to compromise has betrayed Ma on every level, Mordor's betrayal of Saruman. Only this time he can't do his Saruman in Orthanc imitation...
_______________________
Don't miss the comments below! And check out my blog and its sidebars for events, links to previous posts and picture posts, and scores of links to other Taiwan blogs and forums!

6 comments:

Jerome Besson said...

"Now the pendulum is swinging the other way".
Now I get the "pivot" euphemism.

Anonymous said...

A fun irony of the current situation is Ma practically acting like he is the KMT 2016 candidate.

Anonymous said...

There are numerous similarities between the KMT and the Democratic Party.

1996, incumbent KMT president (Lee) gets reelected; incumbent Democratic (Clinton) gets reelected.

2000, KMT vice president (Lien) gets defeated in presidential election; Democratic vice president (Gore) gets defeated in presidential election.

2004, KMT fails to wrest the presidency away from incumbent DPP president; Democrats fail to wrest the presidency away from incumbent Republican president.

2008; KMT capitalizes on massive public dissatisfaction with unpopular DPP president (Chen) to capture the presidency in a landslide; Democrats capitalize on massive public dissatisfaction with unpopular Republican president (Bush) to capture the presidency by a wide margin.

2012; Incumbent KMT president still manages to win reelection; albeit by a narrower margin than before; incumbent Democratic president still manages to win reelection; albeit by a narrower margin than before.

2014; The president is very unpopular and the KMT suffers a massive defeat in the 9-in-1 elections; the Democrats also suffer a massive defeat in the 2014 midterm elections.

2016; The KMT might run a female presidential candidate (Hung); the Democrats will probably run a female presidential candidate (Hillary Clinton.)

Shin-Howe Chen said...

I have to admit, i enjoyed the Lord of the Rings reference :P well said.

Mike Fagan said...

"Mordor's betrayal of Saruman. Only this time he can't do his Saruman in Orthanc imitation..."

Saruman was better. At least he had a stash of Old Toby tucked away in his cellar. Can't imagine Ma sitting back with a pipe and some weed.

Anonymous said...

International politic is a dangerous game. Taiwan is a hot spot. The leadership of Taiwan has to be smart. People of Taiwan need to decide who they want to be. Forging a independent country or sell out to who ever that is powerful at the moment.

Taiwan now have the chance. Changes are painful but it even more painful to let other decide for you.