The Council on Foreign Relations offers this interview with Taiwan expert Alan Romberg, on the new Ma regime. The skinny is simple: Romberg offers the Establishment view that Ma means better Taiwan-China relations. That's probably true too, in the way that the Warsaw Pact offered better USSR-Eastern Europe relations....on to the discussion:
Ma wants to take things back to a period about 13 years ago but he is not about to even talk about unification, much less to negotiate anything. Rather, he wants to take this issue, the principle of One China, in which he has his own definition, then set the issue aside and move ahead with the PRC on a variety of fronts. He wants an economic agreement, quite early on; to establish much more frequent charter flights than now exist, then scheduled flights. Then over the period of what he hopes would be his first term, a peace accord, and what he calls a “modus vivendi,” an agreement by which Taiwan could have greater international participation or what Taiwanese call international space. He looks forward to a much more robust relationship across the Taiwan Strait and a much reduced level of military confrontation.
This is pretty much the same language Ma has been using for the last two years, right down to the peace accord and the modus vivendi. The DPP also wanted peace but was unwilling to sell Taiwan to get it, so it is hard to see how Ma can avoid that and get what he wants: Taiwan will almost certainly be sold to China somehow. But Romberg was asked if the PRC will accept Ma's position, and answered:
I think it is obvious that the PRC interlocutors were being disingenuous with Romberg -- the "confrontational mode that were in" was entirely the result of choices made by the PRC in how it would react to Chen Shui-bian. Nobody held a gun to their heads and forced them not to negotiate, brand Chen a radical, and repeatedly refuse or disengage from talks with Taiwan on a range of issues. The PRC could have gotten out of the confrontational mode anytime they wanted, merely by choosing to talk.
I think they will go along with the way he has been handling the One China issue. Basically they say they won’t accept what he says but they will live with it and move on. During the campaign, Ma was quite insistent on sticking with this “One China, Respective Interpretations” approach. President Chen, and Frank Hsieh the nominee of the Democratic Progressive Party, the DPP, both said the PRC had never accepted this and was not going to accept it. Well, I spent a lot of time in conversations with officials and experts on the mainland and I think it’s very clear that they are going to accept it. The PRC was anxious to get out of this very confrontational mode that they were in with Taiwan and try to put this whole thing back in a box and try to establish relationships that would over time win hearts and minds, but also to focus on their high priority, which is economic development.
More interesting than any of the policy stuff, a pavane whose moves all performers are familiar with, is Romberg's take on Ma the person:
He is certainly very comfortable with Americans and other Westerners in English. He is fluent and has spent a lot of time, as you say, being educated in the West. He’s a very calm person who does not, at least as far as one can tell, easily get riled up. One of the charges against him from his opposition in the election is that, on issues where he was pressed hard, he was very uncertain of himself and kind of flip-flopped. The biggest example of that in the campaign was when Frank Hsieh said that Ma had a “green card”--a permanent residence card to the United States and Ma was asked, do you have a green card, and he said “no I don’t.” It turned out that he had had a green card but he believed it had expired and so there was a great debate on whether it had expired.
Ma gets so many points for speaking good English and knowing how to handle Westerners..... he strikes me as vindictive, easily flustered, spoiled, egotistical, and something of a mama's boy. But that's just my opinion based on watching him since the early 1990s. I've never actually spoken to the man....
Ma has been talking about the fifty year peace agreement, originally an idea put forward by Soong in 1999 for the 2000 Presidential campaign. Romberg observes:
Ma, when he originally talked about this, talked about it for a period of thirty to fifty years. In my conversations in Beijing, people have said “we’re perfectly happy to talk about a peace agreement but we’re not going to sign a piece of paper that essentially says we essentially recognize that Taiwan is not going to be unified with the mainland for such a long time, even if that turns out to be the case. We just can’t accept that long of a period of time as a formal position, codified in some sort of document.”
Romberg does I think misunderstand on one point:
One of the issues that have been under negotiation but never came to fruition under the Chen Shui-bian government but I think will under the Ma administration is PRC tourism.
PRC tourists have been coming for a while -- one sees them at all the tourist sites, but thankfully they travel in tour groups and thus never show up to crowd the really good spots -- but their number has been carefully limited. Hopefully Taiwan will preserve this policy of confining them to Sun Moon Lake and various department stores, parting them from their cash, and sending them on their way. Much money has been expended on preparing for the anticipated hordes to be let in under Ma, so expect these numbers to rise.
In addition to pressures from Beijing and from Washington, Ma also faces the impatient wrath of the foreign businessmen. The Taipei Times reported on the European Chamber of Commerce:
By August, the ECCT expects Ma to realize his campaign promises, including direct weekend charter flights to China, allowing 3,000 Chinese tourists per day to Taiwan and eliminating the 40 percent cap on China-bound investments while providing tax incentives for high-tech companies, as a way to boost the local economy and create a friendly environment for foreign businesses, ECCT chairman Philippe Pellegrin told reporters after a board meeting with the chamber’s 15 directors.
And of course:
In addition, the chamber expects that by the second phase in December, Ma would lift foreign investment limits such as the 0.4 percent ceiling on Chinese H-shares, remove the ban on Chinese imports and develop a global marketing campaign to highlight the nation’s advantages and development potential.
In a year, the chamber hopes Ma will fulfill his “roadmap to prosperity” by implementing regular direct passenger and cargo flights across the Strait, lowering corporate and personal income tax to levels that are competitive with Hong Kong, Singapore and South Korea, and extending the tax loss carry forward period to 15 to 20 years from the current 10 years, while revitalizing the coastal zones to develop the yachting and water sports industry.
So from the period May to December, or about six months, foreign capital expects that Ma will completely open Taiwan to China, after eight years of carefully managed contacts. The pressure on Ma to deliver is immense..... and lots of things can go wrong here.
[Taiwan]
9 comments:
Your caption reads: “This week I am existing on cabbage and tomato curry. Yum.” I would hate to sound pushy, but I’d guarantee you a gustatory epiphany would your wife check the following out. My key-word was “achard”.
http://ile-maurice.tripod.com/
Ma gets so many points for speaking good English and knowing how to handle Westerners..... he strikes me as vindictive, easily flustered, spoiled, egotistical, and something of a mama's boy.
Not that my opinion counts for much but I have almost the same feeling about Ma as you do. Except replace mama's boy with puppet.
Ma made his policy concerning China known from the very beginning. Now, that he has won by a landslide, he better deliver or he would last only four years.
The will of the people, what can you do?
.
.
.
On the 1992 so-called "consensus" which is only a consensus in the sense that one agrees to disagree...
China has nothing to lose if they accept this silly notion of one-China two interpretations. Taiwan is going to look awfully silly when the government's official line is, "China = R.O.C.".
It is a win-win situation for China, diplomatically. This is PandaMa's first step towards unification.
.
.
.
My dad knew Ma back when both where students at 台大, and was "encouraged" to join the KMT in order to continue their education in the US. He said that Ma was pretty much a 乖孩 and would rarely speak out, didn't seem to have any strong opinions, and overall gave off an impression of being nice and respectful. My dad generally has a good opinion of Ma (but the last time they talked was in graduate school many decades ago) and doesn't think that Ma would try to turn back the clock so to speak on democracy, but fears he might not be strong enough to stand up to the old guard of the KMT.
In my conversations in Beijing, people have said “we’re perfectly happy to talk about a peace agreement but we’re not going to sign a piece of paper that essentially says we essentially recognize that Taiwan is not going to be unified with the mainland for such a long time, even if that turns out to be the case. We just can’t accept that long of a period of time as a formal position, codified in some sort of document.
That's the most interesting point here to me. What will they accept on paper? And will it be enough to preserve our de jure independence or will it sell us out?
Thomas, two years ago Ma admitted that China had not agreed to the peace agreement and modus vivendi language.
China is really the wild card here, as is, to a lesser extent, the Taiwan legislature. What China will do no one can tell -- especially if Ma shows up to negotiate at the Olympics.
Michael
About China's agreement with Ma's One China, Different Interpretations thing, I would be interested to see if the PRC version of what Ma proposes will be different from what Ma proposes in the end.
I remember one particular example of a series of negotiations between Japan and China. This was about a year ago. Unfortunately, I have forgotten what they were over. The two sides came to an agreement in Japan, yet the Japanese found out afterwords that the document that the Chinese later prepared differed from the Japanese document in one key area. Does anyone remember this?
Once I had to interview Ma on the phone for an article on running and the Terry Fox run when I worked at one of the papers. My roommate thought it would be funny to yell, "'(My Name)' Loves You!'" in the background. Ma sort of paused and then went on with his particular answer.
Ma's big running tip was to always stretch properly, BTW. (That explains his luscious, purring thighs.)
Post a Comment