Pages

Saturday, October 23, 2010

US-Taipei Disarray and the Status Quo

Staunch Taiwan supporter Arthur Waldron on Taiwan, China, the US, and Defense in the Jamestown brief. The piece gives a picture of disarray within the Ma government, caught by surprise by the sudden Chinese aggressiveness in recent months....
I made a plunge into the world of Taipei gossip and rumor, within which I have some relatively reliable sources. I heard, from the blue camp, a distinctly dispiriting account of the Ma administration. The government, so the analysis went, had staked, if not everything, then "ninety percent" on improving relations with China. Clearly, they had made some gains. On the trip home, I ran into a responsible American official who described the recent Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (aka ECFA, signed June 29) as "amazingly" favorable to Taiwan. Yet, little consideration, my Taiwan sources told me, had been given to the need for an alternative approach, should China prove uncooperative.

Some among the blues said that even the ostensibly urgent appeals to the United States for advanced fighter aircraft and other weaponry had been undercut, via back channels that told the Washington administration that Taiwan did not really want approval of the weapons (this would have been before the sobering events of the summer). Other sources reported that the United States was aware of traffic between China and Taiwan that undercut the latter's public position. None of this seemed on the face of it implausible, given that when out of power the Kuomintang had stifled funding in the Legislative Yuan (Taiwan's parliament) for the Bush administration's unprecedented comprehensive arms sales offers to the island. Had they not done so new F-16s may already be flying in the skies over Taiwan.

...............

The new cold breeze blowing from China, however, looks to have had some effect on Taiwan, and is likely to continue to do so. A foreigner who had recently met with a number of regional governments told me that in his opinion not one expected anything other than trouble from China in the years ahead. As already mentioned, Taiwan's government would seem to have slowed down the rate at which it has been embracing cooperation with China. As a coalition of other Asian states takes shape to counter-balance China, I argued in my presentation at the conference, it was unlikely that democratic Taiwan would take the side of a dictatorship against other democracies (among other things the military would never stand for this—I was told), and even more unlikely that the United States would seek to force a democratic country like Taiwan to make terms with a would-be regional hegemon.
Meanwhile Nat Bellocchi on the Status Quo:
However, during the administrations of former presidents Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), it was also used by the US to dampen initiatives that were perceived as “rocking the boat.”
This was the same point I made a few days ago: the Status Quo evolved into a cage for Chen Shui-bian and Lee Teng-hui. But there was never any criticism of the Chinese missile build up in terms of the Status Quo. Now that Ma is in power and the KMT is sleeping with its pals from Beijing, there is no mention of the Status Quo at all. It has disappeared from the conversation.

The Status Quo was leverage. A tool, now tossed away.

Those bars of Status Quo could have imprisoned Ma just as effectively as they had Chen -- and been a moral bludgeon against Beijing. The US could have growled a few warnings, noting that Ma and the KMT had no majority support for the project of annexing Taiwan to China, and based them on the Status Quo. That now represents another blown opportunity -- now China is suddenly becoming more aggressive, and the KMT plan to put Taipei in China's orbit has stalled thanks to splits within his own party, as Waldron documents above, and effective opposition in the form of election defeats and low poll numbers. Had the US insisted on the Status Quo as a living policy, it might now be in a better position to re-incorporate Taiwan into the Japan-Taiwan-US security alliance.

Maybe it's not to late to start talking about the Status Quo. Could give those in the KMT and in the Ma Administration policy cover and the space to advocate a retrenchment at a greater distance from Beijing.
_________________
Daily Links:
_______________________
Don't miss the comments below! And check out my blog and its sidebars for events, links to previous posts and picture posts, and scores of links to other Taiwan blogs and forums! Delenda est.

4 comments:

  1. I like how you assume that it would be in the KMT's best interests to adhere again to the status quo. Let me use a business example to hopefully open your eyes to some realpolitik.

    Taiwan and Korea have started encroaching in on Japan's territory of the builder of small electronic shit you don't care about, but is really important for your electronic devices. We're talking things that have a 40-200% profit margins(for you scholarly types, this is a mother lode of a profit margin, Goldman Sachs would sell their wives, prostitute their daughters and sell their parents for organ donation for this) that you can't even name in English outside of doo-hickey and capacitor. Now that China has a rare earth monopoly thanks to US greenie-weenies they can reward loyal subjects with rare earths in order to undercut the Japanese and hurt their monopolies while teaching the Koreans an important lesson in subjugation and dominance. Tow China's line, you get to make lots of money and if you don't, well we got people who can make your economic situation even worse than it already is.

    The KMT needs money to stay in power. The Chinese offer an easy way to make money to stay in power because while the Japanese may be more expensive in the doo-hickey dept, they have failure rates that are like 1 in a million-trillion versus 1 in 10,000 like Korean and Taiwan manufacturers. In sophisticated electronic device you want less failure do to the high cost per product and warranty costs.

    In reality rare earths show an opportunity for China to reward loyal Taiwan compatriots in a market that was till recently cornered by the Japanese due not to cost but technological efficiency. While suppliers may wish to buy superior Japanese products they can't because they don't have the necessary materials to make them anymore or they do so at a cost that is high enough to warrant a larger failure rate in Taiwanese manufacturers at a cheaper cost.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Shame on you Michael: Parallelism. US-Taipei -> US-Taiwan or Washington-Taipei

    ReplyDelete
  3. Taiwan and Korea have started encroaching in on Japan's territory of the builder of small electronic shit you don't care about, but is really important for your electronic devices. We're talking things that have a 40-200% profit margins(for you scholarly types, this is a mother lode of a profit margin, Goldman Sachs would sell their wives, prostitute their daughters and sell their parents for organ donation for this) that you can't even name in English outside of doo-hickey and capacitor.

    You're cute Okami. Do you know what my first and second PHDs were/are in?

    Now that China has a rare earth monopoly thanks to US greenie-weenies

    It must be hard for you, living in an alternate universe.

    Tow China's line, you get to make lots of money and if you don't, well we got people who can make your economic situation even worse than it already is.

    If you're going to lecture people on what they do and do not know, you might want to think about getting your basic English correct. It's "TOE" the line, Okami.

    Your analysis is simplistic to the point of inanity.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Shame on you Michael: Parallelism. US-Taipei -> US-Taiwan or Washington-Taipei

    Hahaha. Some days you get the bear....

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.