++++++++++++
Letter dated 18 August 2008 from the Permanent Representative of China to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General With reference to the letter submitted by Nauru, the Gambia and a very few other countries on 14 August 2008 on the so-called "Taiwan’s participation in the activities of United Nations specialized agencies", I have been instructed to solemnly state China’s position as follows:
1. By raising the so-called proposal on "Taiwan’s participation in the activities of United Nations specialized agencies", Nauru, the Gambia and a very few other countries intend to create "two Chinas" or "one China, one Taiwan". This is a violation of China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, and interference in China’s internal affairs, and is thus firmly opposed by the Chinese Government and people. Such practice runs counter to the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations as well as the constitutions and statutes of specialized agencies of the United Nations system. It is also detrimental to the prevailing good momentum in the peaceful development of cross-Strait relations.
2. There is only one China in the world. No matter what changes occur in cross-Strait relations, China’s adherence to the one China principle will never change. For historical and other reasons, the mainland and the Taiwan region are not yet reunited, but the fact that the two sides belong to one and the same China has never changed. As China is the shared homeland of the Chinese people across the Taiwan Strait, the 23 million Taiwan compatriots are important components of the Chinese nation, and people on the two sides of the Strait share the same blood and destiny.
3. The United Nations and its specialized agencies are intergovernmental organizations composed only of sovereign States. This is clearly stipulated in the Charter of the United Nations and the constitutions and statutes of the specialized agencies. The so-called "principle of universality" is also based on sovereign States. As a part of China, Taiwan is not a sovereign State. The claim by a very few countries that specialized agencies should allow the Taiwan region to "participate" in their activities under the "principle of universality" is unfounded. Since 1993, the General Committee and successive sessions of the General Assembly have rejected the motion on the so-called "Taiwan’s participation" or "membership" in the United Nations tabled by a very few countries each year. Since 1997, the Executive Board of the World Health Organization (WHO) and successive sessions of the World Health Assembly have also rejected the motion tabled each year by a very few countries on Taiwan’s "membership" or "participation" in the World Health Assembly as an observer. Facts have amply proved that the Taiwan region is not eligible to "participate" in the activities of specialized agencies.
4. The Chinese Government attaches great importance to the well-being of the 23 million Taiwan compatriots and understands their aspiration for and feeling about participating in international activities. The Chinese Government is never opposed to commercial and cultural exchanges and cooperation between the Taiwan region and other parts of the world. In 2005, on the basis of the one China principle, the Chinese Government reached with the Secretariat of the World Health Organization a memorandum of understanding, which provides facilitation to medical experts of the Taiwan region in their participation in WHO technical conferences and activities. The Taiwan region has unfettered access to health and medical information of the World Health Organization. The Chinese Government has also adopted a fully flexible and constructive attitude towards Taiwan’s participation in multilateral activities in organizations such as the World Trade Organization and APEC.
5. Since March this year, thanks to the concerted efforts of people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, cross-Strait relations have shown a good momentum of improvement and development. Under the new circumstances, we will firmly adhere to the theme of peaceful development in cross-Strait relations, and continue to enhance our exchanges and cooperation in all areas. It is true that there are still some outstanding questions left over from history and some of them are hard nuts to crack for the time being. But we anticipate that the two sides will make joint efforts, under the one China principle, towards the establishment of a framework for peaceful development of cross-Strait relations and strive for a new prospect in the relationship.
As an internal affair of the Chinese people, the participation of Taiwan compatriots in international activities should be resolved through consultation by the Chinese people across the Taiwan Strait. We are fully confident that, so long as the two sides work together in a spirit of "building mutual trust, putting aside differences, seeking common ground and striving for a win-win result", we will surely be able to create conditions and find an appropriate solution through consultation.
6. The Chinese Government urges Nauru, the Gambia and a very few other countries to observe the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations, especially the principles of respecting State sovereignty and territorial integrity and non-interference in other countries’ internal affairs, and comply with the constitutions and statutes of specialized agencies. We urge them to stop doing things that undermine China’s interests and hurt the feelings of the Chinese people, and refrain from creating obstacles to the peaceful development of cross-Strait relations. We hope Member States will continue to adhere to the one China principle, appreciate and support the efforts made by the Chinese Government to maintain peaceful development of cross-Strait relations, and work concertedly to safeguard peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region and the world as a whole.
I have the honour to request that the present letter be circulated as a document of the General Assembly, under item 112 of the provisional agenda.
(Signed) Wang Guangya
Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary and Permanent Representative of the People’s Republic of China to the United Nations
++++++++++++++
Ma's policies to gain international space appear to be destined for failure, at least at this point. But observe how both the PRC and Ma use the same language in referring to Taiwan -- "Taiwan region" and "Chinese people on both sides of the Strait" etc. Scary.
[Taiwan]
I really like the ideas of shared "blood" and "history". These are concepts that have no place in the discussion of modern nation states or state sovereignty. They are wild mythological fantasies and nothing more than constructions of two Chinese nationalisms. Then you get into the the Han ethnic hegemony by playing up what kind of blood constitutes one's nationhood. If I had more time I'd try to pick this apart piece by piece. What fun!
ReplyDeleteTaiwan people need to nip the "Taiwan Region" talk in the bud immediately.
ReplyDeleteFrom yesterday's Taipeitimes:
Ma then said that “over the past 10 years, the number of suicides in the Republic of China, Taiwan region...”
Presidential Office Spokesman Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) said yesterday....“There is nothing wrong in the president referring to Taiwan as the Republic of China, Taiwan region, during a non-political occasion,” he said.
“The public should refrain from overinterpreting the president’s remarks, because they did not have any political meaning,” he said.
I've heard the KMT come out with many ridiculously stupid things over the years, but this Taiwan Region non-sense is the most dangerous. At some point a reporter should confront Ma/KMT about their fantasy world point of view.
That actually used the phrase, "...hard nuts to crack..." in an official letter?
ReplyDeleteHow.... folksy.
Well, the Taiwan region thing is of course nonsense but its hardly news. Just look on the number plates of 50% of the cars and motorbikes here, it says "Taiwan Province".
ReplyDeleteOh no, he said 'Taiwan region'?! He said Chinese race?!. Let's impeach him, okay?
ReplyDeleteThis is compared with the glorious Chen Shui Bian, whose leadership not only led to Taiwan (once part of the Four Asian Tigers) drowning itself socially and economically in the puddle of decadence, but proves himself and his whole family to be corrupt to hell and back. DPP which once props him up even in the face of scandals one after another now say they don't know who he is.
Write an article about the corruption case, and how much Chen stole from the people of Taiwan. I don't see those much in the tubes.
If a white guy tried to talk about "shared blood and destiny" at the UN he'd be lynched as a Nazi.
ReplyDeletedrowning itself socially and economically
ReplyDelete2006 growth: 4.8%
2007 growth: 5.7%
2008 first half: 6.06%
Do they give the 50-centers stoopid pills?
Write an article about the corruption case, and how much Chen stole from the people of Taiwan. I don't see those much in the tubes.
Sure. I wrote on Chen last week. But I need to see where the money is from before I can make slanderous accusations about its origin as "the people's money." Looks to me like he kept money that people gave to him. You got evidence? Submit it, please.
Michael
what frosts my ass is that no official agency in the world is willing to call China on this fantasy they have with Taiwan.
ReplyDelete"she's my girl - she just doesn't know it, and she hasn't moved in with me yet - but she's my girl"
they are insane.
"Oh no, he said 'Taiwan region'?! He said Chinese race?!. Let's impeach him, okay?"
ReplyDeleteOK, why not? You goons tried to do the same thing to Chen based on what at that time was hearsay and rumor. I've got my NT$100 when Shi Ming-teh is ready to get back to work protecting Taiwan. Why wait to find out for sure what Ma is trying to accomplish? Rampage now and collect the facts later. It's a proven method.
Oh, wait - Ma is being pragmatic, taking the high road, finding common ground, etc....! Kind of like Hello Kitty on steroids.
Yeah, let's have more reports of how much money Chen swindled the country out of and what a madman he was ruining the economy and endangering Taiwan with his independence extremism. Local boy Chen easily milks the KMT's own system for what it was worth as the KMT watches helplessly. That's much more exciting than making sure the government - regardless of what color is in office - cleans up the system and puts in the desperately needed checks, balances, and oversight necessary to prevent this from happening so easily. Better idea: let's see more reports of what the KMT is doing to clean up the monster they created.
While your at it, write about James Soong the former KMT VP wannabe and PFP Prez wannabe who stole millions of taxpayer NT$ (Lafayette scandal, ChungHsing Bills finance scandal, etc.).
ReplyDeleteFunny, the PRChinaPost ran a story the other day promoting the idea of having Soong appointed premier. How's that for comedy?
KMT supporters need to:
(1) Quit dwelling on CSB, everyone knows he and his family are idiots.
(2) turn off their Korean soap operas and mindless talk shows on TV and start paying attention to the critical issues facing Taiwan.
>Unfortunately, I think its too late.
What's so funny about the whole "Chen stole the money" meme is that in all the rumors, in all the accusations, never was there any mention of the money, the accounts, and the countries that came out recently. In other words, not a single detail of this was known or even heard of as a rumor prior to the magazine coming out with it and Chen's admission of it.
ReplyDeleteThe investigation's strategy right now is funny, they think that oh, let's go back and see if any of those past accusations and rumors were true. While it's still possible they may be, these rumor-mongers can't be all that good if they never knew anything about Chen's overseas accounts and the amounts (even ballpark).
I hope they hurry up and figure out the origins of this money, and Chen should be helping to provide the evidence if he has any sense of conscience and doesn't want to hurt the DPP anymore.
BTW, if people watch Chinese news--Chen say some pretty incredibly stupid things today including 1) if the money was found to be stolen, he would donate it to charity and 2) he wants to run against Ma in 2012. I really don't know what to make of Chen's behavior. I don't believe most of the rumored accusations (actually pretty much all of them), but I also don't buy that the money is clean just cause Chen says it is.
"Write an article about the corruption case, and how much Chen stole from the people of Taiwan."
ReplyDeleteYou mean the money he took from his donors and didn't report for taxes. Big Difference! It just doesn't sound as self righteous.
"drowning itself socially and economically in the puddle of decadence"
ReplyDeleteA more dispassionate, responsible analysis of Taiwan's domestic and international situation can, of course, scarcely be imagined.
I love this fifty-cent nut stuff.
Is point 4 correct - does Taiwan get access to information via the WHO now?
ReplyDeleteAlso, I wonder whether it would be interesting to compare China's claim to Taiwan to Germany's to Austria/Hungary - shared "blood" and "history" would apply at least as well.
Obviously Germany makes no such claim. However accepting China's position would mean to accept that arguments like these overrule self determination, human rights and democracy. Absurd, no?
"It is true that there are still some outstanding questions left over from history and some of them are hard nuts to crack for the time being"
ReplyDeleteHmm.. revisit this metaphor for a moment. Why did they select such a strange twist of phrase?
Think about cracking a nut. A nut cracker relies on two hard clamps applying pressure from opposite sides to smash the shell of the nut and expose the tender meat for consumption. Not only does the language imply force and "violence", it positions these "problems" between two forces (CCP/KMT perhaps?). The metaphor works to "smash" whatever is protecting the meat of the nut rather than subsuming it, incorporating it, allowing the shell to rot away or the nut to evolve into a shell-less variety through natural selection.
What a disturbing metaphor.
1950年三月十三日蔣介石在陽明山莊對國民黨幹部講話時坦誠:「中華民國到去年(1949)年終就隨大陸淪陷而已經滅亡了....我們今天已成了亡國之民」。
ReplyDelete(From 秦國奴的「兩區論」 /江建祥http://www.southnews.com.tw/specil_coul/chiang/00/0112.htm)
冷戰時期,美國可以讓名存實亡的「中華民國」在聯合國任理事國,就是因為它只是一個受控於美國的虛擬政體。可是,如果以台灣名義建國,成為一個新的國家,美國就必須放棄台灣的佔領權。
(From 台灣自救第一步/朱森元 http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2008/new/sep/10/today-o5.htm)
When Taiwan signed its own peace treaty with Japan in 1952, the matter remained unsettled. According to a report from the US embassy in Taipei on July 23, 1952, Taiwan's Minister of Foreign Affairs George Kung-ch'ao Yeh (葉公超) reported to the Legislative Yuan thus: "The delicate international situation makes it that they [Taiwan and Penghu] do not belong to us. Under present circumstances, Japan has no right to transfer [Taiwan] to us; nor can we accept such a transfer from Japan even if she so wishes." In July 1971, the State Department's position was: "As Taiwan and the Pescadores are not covered by any existing international disposition, sovereignty over the area is an unsettled question subject to future international resolution." And this remains the US' stance.
(From: John Tkacik on Taiwan: Taiwan's status remains `unsettled'By John Tkacik in Taipei Times Sunday, Sep 30, 2007, Page 8 http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2007/09/30/2003381074)
一九四五年迄今六十三年間,諸種客觀情勢、現實發展,美國對台灣的任何階段性重大措施與宣示,其跡象在在都顯示美軍至今還沒有結束「軍事政府USMG」對台灣地區的管轄權。因此,台灣仍非主權國家可比,也就沒有進入聯合國問題;但是,台灣人可以經由正確方略的抉擇「建立自己的國家」。
(From: 台灣國際地位/城仲模 http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2008/new/aug/31/today-o2.htm)
To those eager to learn in Chinese about Taiwan’s current international legal status and how the Taiwanese could find an exit from the present morass, I’d like to suggest a web search with such key words as 「舊金山和平條約」 and/or 「佔領權」 and/or 「台灣主權」 and/or 「流亡政府」 and/or 「軍事政府USMG」 and/or 「台灣地區的管轄權」 and/or 「麥克阿瑟一般命令第一號」。
Below, the link to a search in the Liberty Times with「舊金山和平條約」 as key word.
http://iservice.libertytimes.com.tw/IService2/SearchList.php?SKey=%E8%88%8A%E9%87%91%E5%B1%B1%E5%92%8C%E5%B9%B3%E6%A2%9D%E7%B4%84&flag=1&Year=2008&SMonth=1&SDay=1&EMonth=9&EDay=3
Good web search, everyone.
And give us and CSB a break, puriiiiiizu.
A follow-up:
ReplyDeleteMichael, don't worry, this is meant for your Japanese speaking readership. So far, the only one that counts where Formosa matters.
郭正亮:蔣介石確曾說過中華民國已滅亡
http://news.sina.com 2007年10月12日 01:17 中央社即時
http://news.sina.com/tw/cna/101-102-101-101/2007-10-12/01172381256.html
(中央社記者李明宗台北十二日電)民主進步黨籍立法 委員郭正亮今天表示,故總統蔣介石西元1950年的確曾 說過「中華民國到去年年終就隨大陸淪陷而已經滅亡了」 ,中國國民黨卻竄改自己總裁講過的話。 蔣家後代、中國國民黨籍立委蔣孝嚴(台北市)說, 總統陳水扁心裡沒有中華民國,又不敢直接說中華民國 已滅亡,錯引蔣介石說「中華民國已經複亡」,卑劣扭 曲蔣介石的話,他對陳總統保留一切法律追訴權。 郭正亮(不分區)下午在立法院召開記者會表示, 根據1950年十月國防研究院出版的「蔣總統集」第二冊 (演講),1950年三月十三日蔣介石在陽明山莊對國民黨幹部講話原文是「我自去年一月下野後,到年底止, 為時不滿一年,大陸各省已經全部淪陷,今天我們實已 到了亡國的境地了...我們的中華民國到去年年終就隨大陸淪陷而已經滅亡了。我們今天已成了亡國之民」。 他說,蔣孝嚴指蔣介石說「我們的中華民國到去年年終,就隨大陸淪陷,而幾乎已等於滅亡了」,是引用 1974年四版的「蔣總統集」修正版,可見國民黨竄改了 蔣介石的原話。 郭正亮指出,無黨籍立委李敖(台北市)與台北教育大學台灣文化研究所教授李筱峰都曾引用原始資料,指蔣介石確曾說過「中華民國到去年年終就隨大陸淪陷 而已經滅亡了」,蔣孝嚴卻連自己阿公講過的話都不清楚。
おおい!おおい!馬英九先生を初め、KMT議員の皆様を含めて、アメちゃんによれば、お前等が台湾地区と無縁だそうだ。
さ、どうだ?初耳かい、お前等は?
嘘つきだぜ!君等は!
直ぐ上の投稿文をジックリ読みなさい!
その通りですよう!分かったかい?
良し、良し!じゃ!さっさっと消えてくれ!
清国奴鬼子のお前等、消え給え!
So do those rabblerousers in the Tibetan plateau "share the same blood and destiny" here?
ReplyDelete