Pages

Friday, December 21, 2007

Tancredo to Rice: Stop Interfering in Taiwan's Elections

Tom Tancredo's (R-COL) office just forwarded me a copy of his latest effort on Taiwan's behalf: a joint letter of Tancredo and Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) to Sec of State Rice asking the Administration to stop its interference in Taiwan's elections. Go Tancredo! Here's the letter in its entirety:

++++++++++++

The Honorable Condoleezza Rice
Secretary
U.S. Department of State
2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520

Dear Secretary Rice,

We are writing to ask that the State Department cease its repeated efforts to affect the outcome of the upcoming elections in Taiwan, and specifically, the outcome of the planned referendum on membership in the United Nations. Your department has already made its objections to the referendum quite clear, and we are concerned that continued public criticism of the measure by U.S. officials will only contribute to the perception that the U.S. is playing political favorites in Taiwan.

Administration condemnations of the referendum have been numerous and public. In June, State Department spokesman Sean McCormack publicly urged people to reject the proposed U.N referendum. In August, John Negroponte arranged to appear on a Chinese television station to express U.S. opposition to the plebiscite, dangerously mischaracterizing it as “a step toward a declaration of independence.” A few days later, a National Security Council spokesman also blasted the referendum. Our AIT director in Taipei, Stephen Young has repeatedly criticized the proposal. The Deputy Assistant Secretary for East Asian affairs suggested that the “DPP referendum” is “inconsistent with President Chen’s inaugural pledges” (disregarding the fact that President Chen’s pledges were contingent on China not threatening to use force against the island). And just a few days ago, Raymond Burghardt publicly panned the upcoming vote as an obstacle to “develop[ing] relations across the Taiwan Strait.”

One or two public statements would be quite sufficient to convey the Administrations position to Taiwan’s elected officials on this matter. It is not necessary to continue dispatching an endless parade of U.S. officials to denounce and attack the proposal over a six month stretch while parroting the terminology used by the Chinese Foreign Ministry. Doing so is not just unseemly, it is totally unnecessary. Given the vibrant debate on the issue inside Taiwan and the widely varying opinions on the wisdom and efficacy of the referendum among Taiwan’s numerous political parties, the Department’s sustained interference will do little more than contribute to what has already become a troubling – and unfortunately quite understandable – perception in Taiwan that the U.S. government is choosing sides in their elections.

We hope the Administration will refrain from orchestrating any further interference in the referendum question and will instead allow Taiwan’s political leaders, political parties and people to make this decision on their own. The people of Taiwan have earned the right to conduct their elections without coercion from our government, the government of the People’s Republic of China, or anyone else – and we should respect their right to do so.

Sincerely,

Tom Tancredo, M.C.
Dana Rohrabacher, M.C.

++++++++++++

"One or two public statements would be quite sufficient to convey the Administrations position to Taiwan’s elected officials on this matter. It is not necessary to continue dispatching an endless parade of U.S. officials to denounce and attack the proposal over a six month stretch while parroting the terminology used by the Chinese Foreign Ministry."

Yup. Good stuff, gentlemen.

7 comments:

  1. We hope the Administration will refrain from orchestrating any further interference in the referendum question and will instead allow Taiwan’s political leaders, political parties and people to make this decision on their own. The people of Taiwan have earned the right to conduct their elections without coercion from our government, the government of the People’s Republic of China, or anyone else – and we should respect their right to do so.


    The above quote about sums it up for me. The hypocrisy of the Bush administration when it comes to supporting democracy is astounding.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Fantastic! Finally, someone who recognizes what has been going on!

    Hope you don't mind, this is going on my blog too.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Tancredo announced today that he is no longer a presidential candidate. Maybe it is time to find out what Ron Paul thinks about Taiwan.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous, that would be great if Ron Paul felt the same way, but to have two congressmen work together on this is a fantastic start. Just feels great to have a [native] Pennsylvanian (even though he went Texan) rootin' for the little guy.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "Tancredo announced today that he is no longer a presidential candidate. Maybe it is time to find out what Ron Paul thinks about Taiwan."

    No need to ask. Ron Paul is an isolationist. If China invades, Ron Paul will do nothing. However, don't worry, he won't win the nomination; I am pretty sure about this (of course we will find out in less than one month). If he is in the top 2 in Iowa than I am wrong. Huckabee will probably be first and Romney second.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It's good Tancredo made this decision, Taiwan sure could use more of his support in Congress =)

    Say, which US presidential candidate is most favorable toward Taiwan, can't figure out who to vote for.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.