ESWN points out that gangsters have filmed themselves before, and attempts to present this as controversy of the right-to-know versus media publicity for gangsters:
There have been prior instances of Taiwan gangsters shooting their own digital videos for public consumption., and this explains why there is objection to offering publicity to gangsters. Is this news in the name of the people's right to know? Or is this encouraging worse behavior? Internationally, a similar question is whether Osama bin Ladin's videos ought to be shown on television? This is a test of finding the balance between freedom of press and media self-discipline.
Is this really a test between freedom of press and media self-discipline? Perhaps, although the reporter's involvement is blatantly illegal and is not really an information self-discipline issue. But what you won't read on ESWN is that TVBS is Chinese-owned and 100% supportive of the KMT and China -- it is a pro-Blue station to the core. A propaganda staple of the Blues is that Taiwan's society is in a mess -- and of course, videos threatening violence and gangster killings are proof positive that the propaganda is correct. What a coincidence, eh? This gangster is so useful, if he didn't exist, he'd have to be invented. Fake videos are also well known in Taiwan -- see ESWN's profile of a case from two years ago. It is too soon to say what is going on, but you can be sure the whole story ain't out there yet.
[Taiwan] [ESWN] [media] [TVBS] [Taichung]
Michael, how do you like that graphic on the BS-TV page about them "taking the initiative to investigate (themselves)" -- apparently just before the police released the info?
ReplyDeleteTim Maddog
An article in today's Liberty Times seems to confirm my suspicion above. My translation of that headline: "TVBS video fiasco - police already discovered irregularities."
ReplyDeleteTim Maddog
TVBS received a warrant around 4:30 pm and then two hours later around 6:30 pm announced they were doing a investigation on their own volition. So yes, TVBS is bullshitting and if they're going to bullshit about their intentions, there's no reason to trust that the investigation will be clean either.
ReplyDelete