The Chinese language Liberty Times had a spot-on cartoon yesterday depicting the struggle as one between the Chinese KMT and the Taiwanese KMT. Wang is a native of the island, while Ma was born in Hong Kong and is supported by the die-hard mainlander crowd. Whoever wins the election is all but certain to be the candidate for President in 2008, as traditionally the Chairman of the party is also its Presidential candidate.
David over at jujuflop has already noted how this is actually quite an evolutionary election, one in which the KMT is parting ways with its past regardless of who wins. The old guard mainlanders born in China are giving way to the next generation, and Lien Chan, the previous chairman and loser in two Presidential contests, will probably be the last Chair born in China prior to 1949. This has caused considerable unease among the die-hard mainlanders, whose theology of return is being challenged by the reality of old age, death, and Taiwanese democracy.
It seems unlikely that the mainlander Old Guard will permit Wang to win, since Wang is a Taiwanese, and the Old Guard is still smarting from Lee Teng-hui's spectacular betrayal of the KMT. Lee, also a Taiwanese, was a long-time independence supporter who became Chairman of the KMT and President of Taiwan. When I worked for one of the pro-independence groups in Washington DC in the early 1990s there was considerable debate on Lee's actual position on independence, and there was a faction that thought he was a KMT spy. I never had any doubt after reading his award-winning PHD thesis in ag economics, published as Intersectoral Capital Flows in the Economic Development of Taiwan, 1895-1960. Read one way, the thesis is a coldly analytical account of how the two colonial governments of Taiwan, the Japanese and the KMT, utilized price differentials between the agricultural and industrial sectors to transfer capital from the agricultural sector to the industrial sector. Read another way, it is a stunning indictment of KMT agricultural and economic policy, showing how KMT economic policy was essentially a program of enriching the KMT and its cronies by squeezing money out of the Taiwanese.
Traditionally in Taiwan the government has been operated as a Leninist, one-party state. Hence, the government is essentially constructed so that it cannot operate unless the President is also the Chairman of his party. This structural feature of the system of one-party rule is one reason why the Chairmanship of the Party is such a key post. In US politics the Chairman of the Party is the supreme cheerleader and strategist for his party's candidate, but in Taiwan, the party Chairmanship has traditionally been the real source of the candidate's power. The DPP has been attempting to rectify that inherently Leninist structure both by separating the Presidency from the Chairmanship, and by instituting Constitutional reform. Those readers who read the mainlander screed ESWN posted to his blog last week, and the responses from myself and David at jujuflop, should reflect on this structural feature: one reason for the government's awkwardness and ineptitude was that it was never designed to operate as a democratic state, but instead, was erected to be merely the formal and visible skeleton of one-party rule. The DPP's proposals for constitutional reform are one attempt to address this problem.
UPDATE: The Taipei Times has an editorial on the election today, betting too on Mayor Ma. Interesting, the TT sees Ma as working on moderating his own stance on controversial issues involving the KMT:
"....Ma on the other hand has been something of a thorn in China's side on the erosion of democratic standards in Hong Kong and its human-rights situation in general. Ma, it appears, will want to tread a fine line between stressing Taiwan's Chineseness (during his terms as mayor he has been a tireless promoter of "mainland Chinese" cultural forms and activities) and his apparent dislike of the government and political system of contemporary China....UPDATE: Don't forget to read the comments below, as they disagree with my position.
......
.....Ma seems ready to admit there are illegally acquired assets and that these assets should be restored to their rightful owners. He claimed that the KMT had a right to defend its legally acquired assets, which of course it does. But given the Control Yuan's findings and Ma's legal background, it will be interesting to see how he interprets what is "legally acquired."
Technorati: [Taiwan]
Interesting comments about Lee's PhD thesis - I'd never heard that before!
ReplyDeleteHowever, I'm not sure I have the same take as you on the KMT elections (i've been meaning to write it up before the 16th): I see Wang as the KMT insider, and Ma as the outsider. I believe most of the senior KMT members support Wang (wherever they were born), and it's only the rank-and-file KMT mainlanders who support Ma (Oh, and the 18-year-old girls, obviously).
Anyway, what's the big issue with where Ma was born? Nothing wrong with being born in Britain :)
Hmmm...I don't see it as an insider/outside thing, but as a Taiwanese/mainlander thing. I read Ma as getting strong support from the Old Guard, the kind of people who support Soong as the legitimate, if tainted, heir of the Chiang family dynasty. I'm skeptical that Wang has any support from that direction, being a Taiwanese. Maybe the senior Taiwanese cadres all support Wang.
ReplyDeleteMy money at the moment is on Ma. I suspect he'll run for the Presidency in 2008, and I suspect that everyone is going to be shocked when he is roundly trounced by Hsieh or Su in the next election. If the KMT wants power again, they need to pick Wang to lead the party and run for the Prez in '08.
I think I'll post on the capital transfer situation and how the Taiwanese got screwed sometime later this week.
Michael
My initial impression is the same as David's: Wang is the KMT insider with all of the support that really counts while Ma is the outsider who has the support of a lot of people who aren't that important. My ill-informed guess is that the party chairmanship election is going to turn out like the 2004 Democratic Iowa caucus where the guy with supposedly the most public support but almost no support from senior party officials gets his ass whupped by an unexpectedly large amount.
ReplyDeleteAnd then Wang is going to beat Frank Hsieh handily in 2008 and there's going to be serious cross-straits rapproachment by 2012.
Hmmm...maybe I'll have to change my views!
ReplyDelete