tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10698887.post9118380217272300120..comments2023-10-22T18:25:39.688+08:00Comments on The View from Taiwan: China Confirms Carrier BuildMichael Turtonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17974403961870976346noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10698887.post-49780233226393319302009-01-02T11:34:00.000+08:002009-01-02T11:34:00.000+08:00Trolls like you are hilarious. Thanks for the ente...Trolls like you are hilarious. Thanks for the entertainment, man.Michael Turtonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17974403961870976346noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10698887.post-78454328772654191292009-01-01T14:59:00.000+08:002009-01-01T14:59:00.000+08:00Waht is your point? What is the big deal? Are on...Waht is your point? What is the big deal? Are only Americans allowed to have Carriers? Are only Americans allowed to start two preemptive wars and still pretend to be a "peaceful" super power? <BR/><BR/>Since China with Carriers in theory don't add more military threats to Taiwan, this post of yours goes to show that whatever you are advocating is only for American interests, not Taiwan's best interest. You are full of anti-China sentiment, because of your American interests and strange fear of China, not because you really care about Taiwan. People like you advocate for Taiwan's independence so that Taiwan can remain America's bitch or Japan's bitch doing your biddings. <BR/><BR/>Taiwanese are mostly of Chinese decendents. Whether Taiwan eventually becomes an independent country or not, Taiwan will always be closer to China in blood and by our common cultural heritage. Just like Americans' closest ally is still the Brits more than 200 years AFTER it became independent from the British Empire. Let's just say blood is thicker than water.<BR/><BR/>You can take your independent dream and move to Gaza or the West Bank. Those poeple REALLY REALLY demand to have their own country NOW.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10698887.post-67209190936193272582009-01-01T13:21:00.000+08:002009-01-01T13:21:00.000+08:00Happy New Year to all and thanks, Michael, for con...Happy New Year to all and thanks, Michael, for continuing to post on your blog.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10698887.post-16464372914188671842009-01-01T09:25:00.000+08:002009-01-01T09:25:00.000+08:00Well...looks like Taiwan did drill for a possible ...Well...looks like Taiwan did drill for a possible aircraft carrier attack back in April 2007: <BR/>http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/asiapacific/news/article_1291865.php/Taiwan_drill_simulates_Chinese_aircraft_carrier_attack<BR/><BR/>"Taiwan would launch a counter-attack by firing missiles from its warships and F-16 warplanes at the Chinese aircraft carrier." I guess those are the possible counter measures...Dixteelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05689510846926854542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10698887.post-73625379999512725052009-01-01T08:42:00.000+08:002009-01-01T08:42:00.000+08:00It's very likely that China sees Taiwan as a non-i...It's very likely that China sees Taiwan as a non-issue by 2015, especially when Ma also seems to still act with confidence and move closer and closer to China with speed of light, even when the public opinions seem to turn against him and indicate he might not even get re-elected.<BR/><BR/>On the other hand, it's difficult to say China is so confident that it won't have any "contingency plan." And they give the carrier a provocative name that indicates great hostility against Taiwan. It's not hard to imagine they also want to prepare for alternative option, the invasion of Taiwan, at the same time. <BR/><BR/>Some might think that carriers are useless in terms of invading Taiwan and they might be right. But I can think of 2 possible advantages carriers offer on an invasion against Taiwan:<BR/>1. Mobility of strike force: easier access and shorter range on attack runs against east coast, where several Taiwanese military complexes resides. I imagine ballistic missiles would have harder time finding their target on the east coast due to Taiwan's central mountain range. With carriers, they might be able to initiate a rapid, precise and repeated 2nd wave of bombing attack.<BR/>2. Flexibility: if the US decide to intervene, carriers offer more options against the US carrier battle groups which might already be stationed near Taiwan strait when the situation gets hot, and the US air force stationed at Guam, which are most likely the first US force to offer some sort of response to China's action. China already has substantial submarine forces and some destroyers, but a few carriers won't hurt and might help them against the US intervention.<BR/>3. Psychological? China always says "peace" at the same time they build up their forces...I guess it's always easier to rub someone if you have a gun in hand, doesn't matter if the gun is real or fake. <BR/><BR/>The US PACCOM doesn't seem to worry too much about the Chinese carriers construction, but I am sure they are taking the new scenario into account. I wonder what would be Taiwanese military counter measure to the carriers, though.Dixteelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05689510846926854542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10698887.post-35898879894562237502009-01-01T05:32:00.000+08:002009-01-01T05:32:00.000+08:00A move that likely signals that China sees Taiwan ...A move that likely signals that China sees Taiwan as a non-issue by 2015. They've already got Taiwan within military reach along their coast, so why the need for carriers? Obviously they''re trying to extend their reach into the whole world, and they cannot do that without first having Taiwan. <BR/><BR/>Add in today's news of Hu's "olive branch" to Taiwan, things definitely do not bode well at all for Taiwan. Do the 50-60% of the Taiwanese people who support 'status quo,' truly believe this is still status quo?Richardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13864496921909619980noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10698887.post-74966737978360707732009-01-01T01:38:00.000+08:002009-01-01T01:38:00.000+08:00No no no Mr. Chamberlain... we are simply producin...No no no Mr. Chamberlain... we are simply producing masses of modern weapons to stimulate the economy. You have nothing to fear.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10698887.post-43307850538733330272009-01-01T00:43:00.000+08:002009-01-01T00:43:00.000+08:00Wachman is dead on. Read "Why Taiwan?" Taiwan wi...Wachman is dead on. Read "Why Taiwan?" Taiwan will be China's most important military base.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com