This is being passed around:
Dear Friends of Taiwan,
I would like to bring to your attention an amendment that is currently making its way through the Legislative Yuan that if passed could have a profound effect on press freedom, and consequently change the way news is reported in Taiwan.
The offending article is part of proposed amendments to the Children and Youth Welfare Act and the Physically and Mentally Disabled Citizens Protection Act (兒童及少年福利與權益保障法) that are being pushed by an NGO called the Child Welfare League Foundation (兒童福利聯盟文教基金會) with the help of the Ministry of the Interior’s Child welfare Bureau. (內政部兒童局)
The article of concern (No.44) is translated into English below (a Chinese copy is also available):
“Article 44: News publications and programs should not carry the following content which would be harmful to the healthy mental development of children or adolescents: Describing (or illustrating) crimes, the use of drugs, detailed descriptions or illustrations of the act of suicide. Describing or illustrating violence, bloodshed, pornographic sexuality, lewdness or forced sex in detail.”
Article 90 goes on to state that offenders (those in charge of the newspaper or news channels) will be fined between NT$100,000 and NT$500,000 for each offense.
I believe the amendments have passed the first reading in the LY and are currently in the committee stage after being sent back for revisions (more than once). The NGO however is apparently unwilling to drop or amend the offending article.
The passage of the amendments (and therefore the article) is troublesome for a number of reasons:
1) The idea of censoring news in any way is an attack on press freedom.
2) An NGO ostensibly acting on behalf of children should not be allowed to affect the way a whole nation receives its news.
3) Censoring news detail that is deemed unfit for children also means adults are prevented from reading or viewing the same content.
4) The article’s definition of the potential offence(s) is entirely arbitrary and open to widely differing interpretations.
5) It would takes away a news organizations right to self-censorship
While it is undoubted that the intentions behind such an amendment are noble, it is hard to believe that the NGO believes that by avoiding reporting on problematic social issues that those issues will go away.
The potential effect of this proposed amendment can be judged by the fact that nearly all the major newspapers are united in their opposition to it (a rare occurrence indeed as anyone familiar with Taiwan’s media environment will agree.)
The Taipei Newspaper Association is working on a statement against the article (But I don’t have details of when it will come out.)
The Interior Minister will chair a public hearing about the amendment Monday Dec 27th.
A list of contacts is included below to help anyone interested in the story. [MT: I will provide a list of contact info to people who want it, but I won't publish it here.]
- Ben on police officers muzzling a protester of the visit of Chen Yun-lin to Taiwan.
- Taiwan legislators concerned about the nation's FTA strategy.
- A new blog on fishing in Taiwan: Taiwan angler. Looks great. If only I knew why fishing was called "angling." Probably just spelling-challenged fisherman leaving off the 'D' at the beginning.
- Taiwan toughening regs on food imports
- EU gives Taiwan visa waiver.
- There's no angle from which the Kuokuang petrochemical complex is not a disaster. Cancer, as well. Stop that monster before it eats Changhua.
[Taiwan] Don't miss the comments below! And check out my blog and its sidebars for events, links to previous posts and picture posts, and scores of links to other Taiwan blogs and forums! Delenda est, baby.